Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue And Severing Service-Connection

Rate this question


AF1982

Question

Dear Hadit; First, let me start by apologizing for posting on the wrong forum. I did not mean to hi-jack anyone else's post.

Second, I was asked what month in 2002 my SC was established. My C&P was in July and my grant was in October, 2002. I went through Voc Rehab 2003-2005 due to my qualified disability. If anyone has questions, please feel free to ask. Thanks!

REPOST from yesterday:

I have just received a severing decision to my sc knee. The decision argues within itself...; it acknowledges my dislocated patella in the service and that a later automobile accident doctor verified it was an old injury, reaggravated by the accident.

Due to the area of AF service I was in, after I received my honorable discharge in 82 I just wanted to forget the military existed and wanted to try to move on with life. I was never one to run to doctors with my discomforts, as those who know me attest.

My knee was always a problem after the service injury; I just dealt with it, using my sleeve-brace and avoiding certain physical things when the knee would flare up.

7 years after my service I was in a work-related auto wreck and reaggravated my knee. The work-comp doctor documented it was an old injury reaggravated.

In 2002 my knee was at the point where it was dangerous to me. I'd already had one fall and the constant locking and swelling was driving my wife up the wall. So, I sought VA Voc Rehab and was told I also qualified for SC benefits. My disability was evaluated and recognized at 20% at that time. I wasn't seeking SC benefits, only Voc Rehab, but VA said I qualified for both. I told them about the 1989 auto wreck, as I had no intention to lie to them and they asked for my history. I was approved for Voc Rehab and SC disability at 20% in 2002.

In 2005 my rating went to 30%. 2006 and 2007 I had (2) knee replacements (of my problem knee). The 2nd was due to the first messed up by the VA doctor. My rating went to 60% and my back, neck and hips (and good knee) have been affected by my shifted body-weight being carried.

Following a dismissed med-mal suit against the VA surgeon of the 2006 knee replacement, the VA (U.S. District) attorney emailed VA claiming my disability-injury was not service-connected. This claim was NEVER MADE or even INFERRED, during the lawsuit. This attorney is NO LONGER a U.S. District attorney, as he left that office when I requested a FOIA of his notes and contacts concerning his claim.

My Congressman is involved, and has been the ONLY WAY my attorney and I have been able to get VA to respond to our letters and/or his legal requests in the matter. I have requested an electronic copy (email) of the Sever Decision, and when it is received, I would greatly appreciate your input.

Thank you - I look forward to hearing back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

is there any medical evidence that your knee is not service connected? Last time I checked an attorney is not a doctor. Did you check the rating schedule? do they consider your knee better now that it has been replaced? What is the complete wording of the decision? You've posted twice now and only include a snippet of the decision??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You stated "My C&P was in July and my grant was in October, 2002." When was your application date?? What year was your July C&P?? Was the 2002 October grant the day it was decided or the award date?? If your C&P was July 2002 then your award should be at least July 2002. Can you post that award letter?? Thanks!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The 2nd was due to the first messed up by the VA doctor. My rating went to 60% and my back, neck and hips (and good knee) have been aff....."

Did the rating award a SC rating instead of 1151 for the medical error?

In other words Did the decision say “as if” service connected for the additional comp?

or direct or secondary SC?

Following a dismissed med-mal suit against the VA surgeon of the 2006 knee replacement, the VA (U.S. District) attorney emailed VA claiming my disability-injury was not service-connected. This claim was NEVER MADE or even INFERRED, during the lawsuit. This attorney is NO LONGER a U.S. District attorney, as he left that office when I requested a FOIA of his notes and contacts concerning his claim.”

So, if the VA rating did not include a Section 1151 award for the higher rating, you certainly could file a 1151 claim now if you have documented medical proof of this:

The 2nd was due to the first messed up by the VA doctor”

Our esteemed member here, Philip, got a proposed severance changed into 100% for a vet here many many years ago.

I never forgot that and in my opinion when the VA tries to propose a reduction, sometimes along with a hearing request the vet can often ask them for more comp, with a formal claim while they are preparing for the hearing on the reduction idea.

This is odd because the VA Regional COunsel wanted to settle with my under FTCA within months after getting my evidence.

Then he was set to retire but obtained a Peer Review report from the VA that also concurred with my charges and he told me he was taking the Peer Review right over to the VARO himself to support my 1151 claim. is office was only a b;lock away at that time.

That is when the MF showed up-the mysterious force.....employed by the VA.

The RC retired, the Peer review doctor got fired, the OGC then got the case in DC and the MF skillfully removed my most critical evidence from the C file.

Only by dealing directy with the OGC and their Strategic health team in Washington, did I discover wat the VARO had pulled on me.

It didnt work. but added two years to my eventual settlement and 1151 award.

(The MF put the stuff back into my C file too . You must think this sounds nuts but I learned some amazing things about how low the VA will go over a wrongful death lawsuit.)

This happened years ago- my husband died due to VA health care almost 18 years ago.

The VA just awarded an additional 1151 issue I had in January regarding a claim I had filed in 2004.

Again find I am assuming a lot here at hadit- that is often the best we can do based on what we are told here.

Like Philip I too would love to see that award letter.

There is no time limit on filing a Section 1151 claim.

In the proposed reduction did the VA question continuity of symptoms?

Do you have a paper trail of medical attention and treatment since getting the original award?

Can you also scan and attach here (cover the personal identifying stuff) the proposed reduction letter?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you to all of you. Below are from my attorney brief submitted in January, 2012. Notice the date of original grant of MAY 24, 2002 AND THIS NEW DATE OF MAY 23, 2012. ATTACHED.

THIS IS FROM LETTER DATED MAY 29, 2012, SEVERING SC ON AUG. 1, 2012

HAS NOT BEEN SCANNED… RATING DECISION MAY 23, 2012 (1 day from 10-year period!)

Your Award Amount and Payment Start Date

Your monthly entitlement amount is shown below.

Monthly Payment Reason for Change

Entitlement Start Date

Amount

$1,102.00 Dec. 1, 2011 Cost of Living (This did not automatically adjust to

your award)

0.00 Aug. 1, 2012 Service connection for your Status post total knee

arthrplasty is severed. You will have no service

connected disabilities.

===========================

Thanks! Hope this information helps.

Edited by AF1982
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta;

An 1151 was attempted afew years back; VA said SC could not file on it. Then the med-mal was filed.

A sister died last night. I won't be posting anymore today. Thank you to all of you. I hope the last comment was right and that the severance is stopped. Can't really afford to lose it and pay the bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use