Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Third Time For Service Connected Issues

Rate this question


klcolclasure

Question

Hello Everyone, I am the wife of a Retired Veteran. When he retired in Dec/2003 he was just happy he was getting a retirement check and some disability. I am the one that pushed him to go back because I work around active/retired folks and it's just wrong for VA not to grant him any additional percentage for service connected issues. Although we are grateful that we just got our claim back after a 2 yr wait and they did put him at 60% verses 40%, when reading their comments, it just makes me angry. I spent months putting together a record for them in chronological order with what we were claiming, dated....ect.....It was bad enough his record sat for the first yr. and they kicked it back cause they were over loaded. See they wanted him to have another C&P exam cause we were claiming alot. But atleast its done and over with. It just disappoints me that they only raised him 10% on three items.

He has had Gerd & IBS since 1999 and had the Lap Nissen surgery in 2007. But the after math from that has not stopped. He is so bloated, gassy, constipated, pain in his shoulder and pain. In 1999 they said he had gallballder problems but that was only one time, but yet he had to have his gallbladder out in 2007 and it's hard to link the two together. In 2006 bloody stool turned into a colonoscopy that was aTublar Adenoma w/ mild dysplasia, 2010 was antral and duodenal ulcers and today the bloating, gas, constipation and pain has not stopped. They saw were he has been to the doctor up to 40 times for all this. I do believe that Gerd and IBS has cause gallbladder and colon issues but can't find anyway to connect these. I am going back on this again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

John is right!

An Independent medical opinion should follow the IMO criteria here at hadit.

“I do believe that Gerd and IBS has cause gallbladder and colon issues but can't find anyway to connect these.”

An IMO doctor can do that, if the medical evidence warrants it.

“In 1999 they said he had gallballder problems but that was only one time, but yet he had to have his gallbladder out in 2007 and it's hard to link the two together.”

“In 2006 bloody stool turned into a colonoscopy that was aTublar Adenoma w/ mild dysplasia, 2010 was antral and duodenal ulcers ….”

A good IMO doctor could, in essense, give a second opinion on all of that as well and hopefully find the actual etiology (cause) for the adenoma or a strong mediocal link to his SC disabilities.

Some IMO doctors like Dr Craig Bash ( we did shows with him available in the SVR archives and I as well as others here have gotten IMOs from him), will often raise a new disability issue in their IMOs if possible,that could be claimed.

I prepared the IMO format here in our IMO forum based on the IMOs I got from him.

He used to work for VA as a doctor, so he knows exactly what the proper medical lingo must be within an IMO.

Any IMO doctor will need to review a comlete copy of all available medical records and also they would need to see either the decisions, or the copies o C & P exams for the decision or better yet-both.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use