Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Location Of My Va File Question

Rate this question


ARTY_CWO

Question

Hello all, I just got my initial claim for disability a couple weeks ago. I retired from Washington state and moved to Oklahoma. My ebenefits has always said under the jurisdiction of San Diego CA. I went ahead and turned in paperwork for additional dcontentions to San Diego then I get this letter from the Muskogee va here in ok that they received my claim. Ebenefits says Muskogee also. Is this normal for my packet to move around like this? If so, I sure hope things are faster at this branch !! Take care all.

Active duty - Nov 1990 - Nov 2011

GiTMO Dec 1994 - Jun 1994

Operation Iraqi Freedom:

Jan 2003 - Sep 2003 3DIVARTY

Jan 2005 - Jan 2006 1/3ID

Jan 2007 - May 2008 1/3ID

Sep 2008 - Sep 2009 4/2SBCT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Well, I guess it's normal under the Benefits Delivery at Discharge (BDD) (or whatever it's called now) program.

If your initial claim was handled by a BDD site, any additional development, Rating Decision, and award promulgation are done by the BDD site.

Then, at some point, you moved to Oklahoma and submitted another claim to the San Diego RO for additional disabilities.

San DIego then transferred your claim to the RO that has the responsibility for OK.

FWIW, if you had stayed in WA state and submitted the same claim, San Diego would have transferred the claim to the Seattle RO.

So, unless you move again, the responsibility for your claim will be with Muskogee. It's likely that all future Rating Decisions will be done by Muskogee as well, unless your fully developed claim is "brokered" to another site for the decision itself.

Hello all, I just got my initial claim for disability a couple weeks ago. I retired from Washington state and moved to Oklahoma. My ebenefits has always said under the jurisdiction of San Diego CA. I went ahead and turned in paperwork for additional dcontentions to San Diego then I get this letter from the Muskogee va here in ok that they received my claim. Ebenefits says Muskogee also. Is this normal for my packet to move around like this? If so, I sure hope things are faster at this branch !! Take care all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Is it "normal" for the VA to ship claims around? Well, yes. The VA "farms out" claims regularly, at their discretion. Mine has been farmed out to 2 different regional offices, so it has been in 3 RO's and I have stayed in the same area since I applied.

Those are the RO's THAT I KNOW ABOUT. I was notified about one, but not notified about the other change but found out about it later, after I requested a copy of my c file.

Moving a VEts claim from one RO to another (the Vet cant do this, only the VA can, unless the VET moves) should result in "speeding up" the claim, in theory at least.

In other words if RO "A" has a 13 month wait, and RO "B" has a 4 month backlog, then it may well make sense to move it to RO "B".

However, it has been my experience that "farming out" my claim to another RO ultimately resulted in more delays.

If you reported your "new" address in Oaklahoma to the VA, then it is likely good your claim has moved, especially if it was not moving at your previous RO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes a lot of sense, thanks for the information.

Active duty - Nov 1990 - Nov 2011

GiTMO Dec 1994 - Jun 1994

Operation Iraqi Freedom:

Jan 2003 - Sep 2003 3DIVARTY

Jan 2005 - Jan 2006 1/3ID

Jan 2007 - May 2008 1/3ID

Sep 2008 - Sep 2009 4/2SBCT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think that when certain time limits or load limits are met they will ship your claim anywhere just to show they are doing something. Claims get shipped to the St. Pete VARO and they are already ten feet under water with claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use