Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Sertraline/trazodone And Ed Sexual Dysfunction Issues...

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I am prescribed both of the meds above. I have some issues going on with ED and dysfunction. I have a PC dr appt coming up but want to be prepared on what to do. Is there an actual c&p exam for these and what is said/done during this. Any help would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What I've heard from others is, the mentioning of using enhancement drugs like viagra, levitra, etc, is saying you don't have the problem when using these drugs, or if you did try them, they didn't work with the ED. Best route is search prior post's by using the search box here on Hadit. Type in something like "ED C&P exams" and/or "ED Questionnaire for ratings". You can also check out different forems here. Other than that, it's all I can do to help. I'm sure others will chime in to help also.

coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I guess what you are saying here is that drugs the doc prescribed for (SC) depression/ptsd has caused ED secondary to sc depression/ptsd. There is no doubt that many/most antidepressants cause ED.

I think this is just like the rest of the stuff. Basically, you need a Veteran friendly doc who prescribes ED meds such as Viagra, and states that this condition (ED) is seconadary to SC anti depressant meds.

If the doc does this, then you should eventually, upon appeal, of course, get the extra 95 per month for "loss of use" of reproductive organ.

Of course, the VA wants to embarrass the Veteran by denying this and make sure he tells the whole world when his case goes to the CAVC that he has ED. Why does the VA just not make Veterans wear T-shirts whenever they go to the mall that says:

"I have ED due to taking anti depressants from my PTSD".

BUT

"I have been denied SC by the VA for Loss of Use of a Reproductive Organ"

....Just to make sure that EVERYONE has read your CAVC/BVA decision, since some may not have.

It is apparently not embarrassing enough to go to your doc to get ED meds....NOoooooooooo...your female doc may not tell EVERYONE. Lets make sure EVERY single person on earth...the entire Regional Office, the BVA, the CAVC staff..and any Vets advocate or attorney that reads about it can say "Gee...I did not know Bob Veteran had ED....I wonder why I saw him at Walmart the other day and he seemed to be pretty happy with his wife....I need to find out what his wife is doing to satisfy HER needs"..

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Paxil is famous for producing ED in men and inability to have orgasm in both men and women. All SSRI uptake inhibitors do this even new drugs like wonder pain drug Cymbalta. Clonazepam will do it to you and all narcotics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I went through a C&P recently for medication use resulting in ED. The exam is standard male exam, they try to see if there are any other possible causes (physical, etc.) for what you might be experiencing and if they rule out the other possibilities, the medication as a cause should remain. My claim was pretty quick with this issue.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ook everyone I had my PC exam and talked to doc about ED issues with meds I am on. He said yes it is caused by the drugs. HE increased my sertraline and went ahead and prescribed me with Viagra.

So since he did say its caused by drugs and prescribed me Viagra should I go ahead and start a claim for ED secondary to PTSD or just do it seperately? I need some good help with doing this and where to start. Thanks for advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use