Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can The Va Open A New Appeal?

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

I was checking eBenefits this morning to try and get payment status for GI Bill to school. I happened to check Appeal Status and found a new appeal for a condition mentioned in the remand from my last appeal. Is this normal? Also, I had an appeal in for this condition, but asked that it be pulled as I thought it was holding up the other (more important) appeal. The remand stated that the VARO had to issue a SOC. Now what???

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Bump...

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I happened to check Appeal Status and found a new appeal for a condition mentioned in the remand from my last appeal. Is this normal?

Yes, this is normal.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Carlie!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I respectfully dissent from Carlie's opinion..either that, or at least one of us does not get the question.

The BVA only has jurisdtiction over claims and issues given to them by the Veteran which begins with the Veteran filing a nod on the applicable issues.

The VA can not appeal its own decision...or even issues within the decision, at least not at the BVA/CAVC levels. The appeal must be initiated by the Veteran or his representative.

However, as Berta has succinctly pointed out, the VA can CUE itself. This, however, would be handled at the RO/DRO BVA level.

The VA can, however, initiate appeal on the Federal Circuit level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bronc,

In the remand from my hearing/appeal, the VARO was directed to issue a SOC for another item I had appealed (GERD) but then withdrew. I didn't want the GERD appeal (I really don't think it was worth the effort for a 0 or 10% max rating) to slow down the bigger issue on appeal. Yet, after going through my file the VLJ must have seen the VARO never issued a SOC for GERD and subsequently ordered it in the remand. Goofy... Also, the remand is going to drive more C&Ps. I had a C&P for the GERD issue not long after I filed the appeal, but it looks like I may have to go through another C&P for this. I'll also have to wait for a C&P for arthritis. The remand stated that this C&P should be scheduled during a flare-up to understand the full impact and limited ROM the condition creates. This would mean going off my 3 meds for arthritis and risking serious pain in order to satisfy the remand. Cruel if you ask me. Either way, I didn't file this other appeal yet here it is. Maybe this is the VARO's action to issue the SOC?

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was checking eBenefits this morning to try and get payment status for GI Bill to school.

I happened to check Appeal Status and found a new appeal for a condition mentioned in the remand from my last appeal.

Is this normal?

Also, I had an appeal in for this condition, but asked that it be pulled as I thought it was holding up the other (more important) appeal.

The remand stated that the VARO had to issue a SOC. Now what???

Just because we request an issue to be "pulled" doesn't mean that the VBA acknowledges

this request.

Many times and for several reasons they continue on and complete action on it.

Your request that the condition be pulled, could be lost in the file, crossed in the mail, etc...

Being that at some point, you had began an appeal for this condition, is why I state it would be normal.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use