Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Temporary 100% Disability Requiremnts

Rate this question


bigdave

Question

I have a 20% disability rating for a service connected shattered right wrist back in 1981. I started having severe pain in the hand about 3 months ago and all of my fingers are pretty much numb 24/7. I went to have tests done yesterday with a neurologist and was told that I had mild carpal tunnel in my left wrist and severe carpal tunnel in the right hand, the one that gives me the disability rating. He said that surgery is highly recommended and that normal recuperation timeframe is about 3 months and definitely in a cast for longer than 30 days. I asked if it was considered part of my service connected disability so I could find out about receiving a temporary 100% rating during the convalescing period. He said it is not his place to make that determination and more than likely would be a situation that would not probably be known if it was or wasn't. Who does make that decision, and if it is determined as service connected, do I meet the eligibility requirements for the temporary rating. While I was at the facility I did go and see the VOC, who said that I would never qualify for the 100% as it was just one hand. He had me fill out a form for an increase of disability percentage, but nothing related to the temporary disability increase. He insisted that there was no temporary increase for my situation even though he said that it is definitely service connnected because it is the same hand that was shattered. I left his office 100% convinced that he didn't know or didn't understand what I was asking. So who decides if it is service connected, and if it is do I qualify for the temporary increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

If a veteran has surgery on a service connected disability and the recovery period is 21 days or longer the veteran is entitled to the temp 100% You stated you had 20% on your wrist. Then, it's service connected. is this your dominant hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meg. He is sc for shattered wrist. Not carpal tunnel. Now I don't know what his rating is, but maybe he could file and try. 21 days is paragraph 29 (in house hospital stay). Paragraph 30 is convalescence.

What is your rating for the wrist?

Try the TL 11-02. Won't hurt to submit it either way. Tl11-02 is quickpay for sc conditions. Worst they'll do is say no, or consider carpal tunnel as part of the right wrist and go from there. Jmho. Good luck.

http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/56836424

Paragraph 30. 38 cfr 4.30

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=5f3d0659a422a7e4753ae31641020d66&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.1.98.26&idno=38

Paragraph 29. 38 cfr 4.29. Hospitalization for more than 21 days.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=5f3d0659a422a7e4753ae31641020d66&rgn=div8&view=text&node=38:1.0.1.1.5.1.98.25&idno=38

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My rating for the wrist is 20%. Who will be the deciding person in determining if it is or is not part considered to be service connected? My GP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My rating for the wrist is 20%. Who will be the deciding person in determining if it is or is not part considered to be service connected? My GP?

NO - not your GP - a VA decision maker will decide the claim.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does the VA decision maker decide the claim? The doctor that gave me the tests said that there was probably no way of determining whether the service connected injury was a cause for the severe carpal tunnel or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use