Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Received 5103 Notice For Remand - Questions....

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

Good afternoon,

Well, I finally received the notice to respond with more support for remanded items from my appeal. I started digging through my copy of my c-file to see if there were any documents the VA asked for that were already in the file. Much to my surprise, I found reports from my STRs that were from the '80s (which the VARO said did not exist in previous decisions, this appeal, etc...) that support my issue that a condition started surfacing while on my initial enlistment. This supports my contention that the issue did NOT pre-exist service, but brings something else to light: if the records are in my hands as part of my c-file, is it a CUE that the VARO never saw/used them?

Also, the latest documents needed by one treating physician are not in my c-file. She is also currently claiming that I owe her $$ from a claim she didn't file timely with TRICARE and was therefore not reimbursed. I assume she will not release the requested treatment records until I pay her the $400.00 she claims I owe. Do I try to get the VA to get the records knowing it will take months, or try to get them myself? I cannot afford to pay her the cash she is demanding (we've been going around and around since 2011), but the remand mentions her by name as having records that will support my claim. HELP!!! I want this over with, but not so much as to sacrifice all the years of work to get to this point only to have things denied because of one doctor's bad billing practices/claims filing.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Also, the latest documents needed by one treating physician are not in my c-file. She is also currently claiming that I owe her $$ from a claim she didn't file timely with TRICARE and was therefore not reimbursed. I assume she will not release the requested treatment records until I pay her the $400.00 she claims I owe. Do I try to get the VA to get the records knowing it will take months, or try to get them myself? I cannot afford to pay her the cash she is demanding (we've been going around and around since 2011), but the remand mentions her by name as having records that will support my claim. HELP!!! I want this over with, but not so much as to sacrifice all the years of work to get to this point only to have things denied because of one doctor's bad billing practices/claims filing.

This is sounds like a mess. Was the doctor in or out of network with TRICARE when you went to her? If she is or was in-network at the time, she has to accept responsibility for not filing in a timely manner. Out-of-network is more tricky. Most providers want you to sign that you're responsible for any payment if insurance does not pay appropriately, which is negated by TRICARE if the provider is in-network. "Timely" in terms of TRICARE time is a year from the date of service from what I understand. Only thing I can suggest is contact your region's TRICARE main office and ask for assistance.

There are too many doctors out there who don't have good office support. We run into this routinely, and as a result, monitor claim processing very closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

TC:

My situation is a bit different: I received a retroactive retirement. In 2012 (Jan) I was awarded a retirment and had to file backdated claims for reimbursment. I sent this doctor a letter with the forms already filled out and a copy of my orders and the SecAF's letter making it all possible. She never filed with TRICARE, so I attempted to do it. TRICARE denied my claim and now she's billing me since then for $450.00. If anything, she sould have reduced her portion but I'll call TRICARE again and see what needs to happen. Still I think she cannot hold my records hostage over a billing issue. If she does, I can see this remand dragging on for years. Her notes and x-rays support my requesting a higher rating while at the BVA Video Telecon. Either way, I have two C&Ps coming up and my appeal was in Jan of this year - can't complain that this took too long. I still don't have a SOC as directed by the BVA, but I don't think I'll get one until my file makes it back to the VARO. I was told that because of the remand, my file was sent to the closest VAMC for the C&P exams. SO: need to get my ducks in a row, capture the info I can and do well at the C&P.

Thanks for helping me with the TRICARE issue. I'll call them today.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I really dont know if that doctor can withold releasing your records on the bases that you owe money. My guess would be no. Obviously, your medical records would be valuable to the next doctor who is treating you, and, by witholding your records over a money dispute, she compromises your future treatment. At least, it is unethical, or it could even be illegal,(malpractice), if you can document she witheld your records over a money dispute and that witholding of records compromised your treatment, that is, caused you to be unhealthy, then the doctor may be liable for your future care.

A lawyer may love something like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

TC:

My situation is a bit different: I received a retroactive retirement. In 2012 (Jan) I was awarded a retirment and had to file backdated claims for reimbursment. I sent this doctor a letter with the forms already filled out and a copy of my orders and the SecAF's letter making it all possible. She never filed with TRICARE, so I attempted to do it. TRICARE denied my claim and now she's billing me since then for $450.00. If anything, she sould have reduced her portion but I'll call TRICARE again and see what needs to happen. Still I think she cannot hold my records hostage over a billing issue. If she does, I can see this remand dragging on for years. Her notes and x-rays support my requesting a higher rating while at the BVA Video Telecon. Either way, I have two C&Ps coming up and my appeal was in Jan of this year - can't complain that this took too long. I still don't have a SOC as directed by the BVA, but I don't think I'll get one until my file makes it back to the VARO. I was told that because of the remand, my file was sent to the closest VAMC for the C&P exams. SO: need to get my ducks in a row, capture the info I can and do well at the C&P.

Thanks for helping me with the TRICARE issue. I'll call them today.

Hope it works out with TRICARE. If she is in-network, or was at the time she treated you, then TRICARE has a process to provide you with relief from the bill.

Broncovet has a very good point, though. Check out HIPAA rules and regs. Under HIPAA, you have access to your records. There is a process through either your state or the federal government to seek relief if she withholds them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So I've started preparing for this: I reviewed my daily diaries, tallied the number of real bad flare-ups (3 in the last 12 months), daily neck pain and sleep disturbances. I'll check this against the DBQ and see what this might mean.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Talked to my VSO earlier today: told me to stop taking meds that will mask the conditions for which I have appealed. I don't know how this will work when the primary med (Humira) has roughly a 6-month half-life in your system before flare-ups start again. He said that even though the documents I sent prove something started in service, they would look primarily at the upcoming C&P results. Why do I feel like I just got set up for failure??

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use