Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Receiving Dic Approved Commissary But Can't Get An Id Card Or Deers

Rate this question


PamelaQ

Question

The VA and DAV treated my late husband and I really well. I am now receiving DIC after his passing due to Agent Orange.

The VA sent me a letter saying I was approved for commissary and exchange. They told me to go to a RAPIDS/DEERS facility to get a card and get entered into DEERS. I need my DEERS record in order to access ebenefits.

But the RAPIDS facility won't enter me or issue me a card! They were nice about it but won't do it w/o a marriage license or common law marriage in my state. My state is not a common law state.

So the VA recognizes a common law marriage but the RAPIDS people don't.

Does anyone have any advice for me?

Does the VA run any RAPIDS offices where I could get entered? I don't understand how I can receive DIC but can't get into DEERS. Is it like the RAPIDS office said and I am "just out of luck"?

thanks for your time, I just found this forum when googlng my question, hope to contribute to it at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hi Berta, no I mean you and I. I respect your opinion, I can tell you know a lot about DIC. I don't know as much. My only contact with NVLSP is as a donor.

If you think that I might not have qualified for DIC that would give me cause for concern and caution.

If I were to find out for sure that I shouldn't be receiving it I will return it to them myself. I've always been a law abiding citizen. Thanks.

By posting the VA regs I meant that I thought a marriage could be invalid according to state common law but valid according to the VA. I take this as an improvement that was help people like me. At least that's how I read it.

Edited by PamelaQ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it sounds unreal to receive DIC approval that quick. The last few DIC claims that I have completed were all done within 30 days. And that's awesome! A couple of years ago a DIC claim was taking a year or longer. Everybody was telling us that the DIC was changing, so lets continued to keep our fingers crossed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meg that is great that you got those DIC awards fast.

Some DIC claims are obviously solid from the git go .

You reminded me I forgot to post this additional info for Pamela:

"The VBN at YUKU also has some good info on common law marriages and the VA:

http://vets.yuku.com/reply/642971/Common-LawInformal-marriage#reply-642971

The repliers there are all excellent claims advocates.

Also in the link from the lawyer I gave you it explains how each state listed determines their common law criteria.

State laws control the VA in these matters.

Also here or maybe in another post at VBN on this subject I read this AM, someone said what I said as to the VCAA letter,which would ask for proof of common law status."

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State laws control the VA in these matters.

Also here or maybe in another post at VBN on this subject I read this AM, someone said what I said as to the VCAA letter,which would ask for proof of common law status."

Thanks for continuing to look into this but I respectfully have to disagree with you on it. During this discussion I was concerned that I should lose my benefits, and I think it's odd to feel that way while on a forum dedicated to helping Veterans and their survivors get their benefits.

From va.benefits.gov

M21-1MRIII_iii_5_SecE.doc (same link I posted earlier)

d. Perceived Common Law Marriage in a State That Does Not Recognize Common Law Marriages

In VAOPGCPREC 58-91, the General Counsel held that if a surviving spouse believed he/she was party to a common law marriage with a Veteran in a State that does not recognize common law marriages, VA must determine whether or not the common law marriage may nevertheless be deemed valid under 38 CFR 3.52.

Reference: For information on a Veteran or surviving spouse not living in a state recognizing common law marriages, see M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iii, 5.C.16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You certainly can disagree.

We don't want any claimant here to lose their benefits. But we are all bound by the regulations.

As I stated in a prior post here:

"Since Missouri is not a common state (they are all listed in the link) possibly the VA determined a common law marriage existed due to both of you living ,prior to moving to Missouri, in a common law state and that criteria was fulfilled for VA purposes.... according to the law of the place where the parties resided at the time of the marriage or the law of the place where the parties resided when the right to benefits accrued.”

Also I am very familiar with the General Counsel Pres Op above and maybe that also fulfilled the VA's criteria for the DIC award,in your case.

I was widowed of two disabled vets and have received three separate DIC awards for my last vet husband's death so I am sure that they (VA) , surely cited,in your award, these same regulations above

and/or the OGC Pres Op that they used ,to determine you are the valid widow.

since they (VA) cited the specific regs in each of my DIC awards that warranted the specific DIC they granted , as it was awarded to me on three different and separate bases.

.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use