Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Can We Trust The Ro To Get Records?

Rate this question


Hoppy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I had to edit this. I tried to embed full sized jpg's and it would not let me. I used to do this many years ago. So now I attached two files of the referenced jp's. Click on the thumbnails to see full jpg's

Now we have to trust the RO’s to request and obtain deck logs. Individuals and Service org’s have been taken out of the loop effective July 8th 2013. I received the information pasted below in italics from a secretary at the NHHC yesterday.

I spoke to the guy in charge of deck logs here at NHHC and he stated that "official requests come to us from a regional office of the federal Department of Veterans Affairs or the VA appeals office here in DC only. State/county/city departments of veterans affairs as well as organizations like DAV, VFW and Purple Heart are not considered official requests."

The RO’s can’t even figure out how to get records from a VAMC. Paste below are two scans from a veterans denial.

post-144-0-44124400-1378261938_thumb.jpg

To keep it short. Here are the facts. The records were not destroyed or lost in the 94 earthquake. A VAMC employee lied to the veteran telling him the records were destroyed when the basement of the Sepulveda hospital flooded from water pipes breaking throughout the hospital. The VAMC records clerk lied because he was too lazy to get the records. Every employee of that hospital knew that no records were lost or destroyed due to the earthquake. The RO was so far out of the loop they believed otherwise. The records were eventually obtained. The veteran notified the RO that the records were found and now in possession of the West LA VAMC. This prompted the RO to request the records in April 2000 as they noted. The RO indicated that no response was received from the VAMC. Because they were out of the knowledge loop they did not make a second request.

Here is where it gets really interesting. The RO says the hospital did not respond to the April 2000 request. However, the veteran was a little upset that the VAMC did not respond. The veteran went to the VAMC and was shown the document below described as “purpose of disclosure”

post-144-0-26617800-1378262113_thumb.jpg

It turns out the VAMC requires that an RO employee personally pick up the records from the VAMC. The records supervisor stated that somebody named Carlos from the RO picked up the records and signed for them on July 27, 2000. The decision denying the claim was made in November 2000. The RO lost the record somewhere between April and November of 2000 and had no way of determining that someone named Carlos had actually picked them up. Don’t they keep records or can’t they read. The records supervisor told the veteran he was not the first veteran to have the VA claim that their office did not respond when in fact they did respond. I have this information because this was my own claim.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hoppy I would never trust the VA to get ANY type of records....

I just reminded others here the other day to follow through on SSDI records requests VA is supposed to make for many claims

if VA is aware of them.

And as you know the St Louis fire has been erroneously used as an excuse by VA many times ,particularly if they see USAF on the DD 214, to fail to even try to get SMRs from NARA.

Hoppy,I bet you have tried every single link here but they might help someone else.

At the BWNVVA site link (bluewaternacy.org) there is contact info for JR (John Rossie) who might have more suggestions.

BTW I always get monthly email from Veterans Resources (Ray B Davis)

http://www.38uscode.com/ His web site site ( email addy ray@valaw.org)

Maybe he could help?

Also he states at his site ::

“Feel free to write with any questions about veteran�s benefits and VA regulations, and I will research your questions, for free.

Ray B Davis, Jr (Editor)

P.O. Box 68

East Flat Rock, NC 28726”

He has been an outstanding advocate for vets for many years. I tried to get him to do an SVR radio show with me, but that isn't his forte and I don't think he likes to talk on the phone about claims as he never publishes his phone number.But he will respond to email.

Decklogs:

http://www.decklog.com/homeport.asp

(searchable data base)

http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org15-1.htm

(article on VA and deck logs)

http://www.usndecklogs.com/

(s0unds like professional researchers)

http://veteransinfo.org/deck_logs.html

http://www.bluewaternavy.org/navdocs.htm

Also I am posting next Ray B Davis's last email to me about a Vets Stand Down here in NY.....Carol is an excellent advocate too and she can be contacted via the info there and might well have other suggestions on deck logs.

VA gave her a heck of a time when her husband died.

But us widows are Tenacious and she succeeded in her DIC claim...........after many denials and lots of research on her part.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta,

Thanks for all the great information.

I should have provided more details. The office providing the information processes requests for deck logs that are less than 30 years old. The bluewater vets and Vietnam vets are requesting logs from a different office.

I contacted the organization you thought were professional researchers. They are in fact professional researchers. They provided some interesting information. They said that the interruption in services is considered temporary. In the mean he said they are not even processing VA requests. He said that there are complaints being filed by every one to the congress at this time.

Most interesting he gave me some good advice free of charge. He told me to request under FOIA Shore Station reports and brig logs where the offender was taken ashore inrestraints. The Navy's FOIA research office is saying that they are also experiencing delays due to sequestration.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have been trying for years to get outpatient mental health records from Hunter Army Airfield/ Ft. Stewart. I know they exist but I get everything but those records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use