Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Ignoring Private Ryan

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

That was an awesome story.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hurts down deep,when they someone else life and family in their hands. Then getting paid extra to destroy everything you touch. While Veterans dies before he or she received any benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, but it does show the VMAC, that's Medical Center, not Benefits Adminstration, is where the "big" bonuses are going. Personally, I think bonuses should be done away with, and time off or a pay raise would be more in order for exceptional work product. Why should anyone get a bonus for doing their job as expected.- just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jumpmaster, it will stop when we as veterans say, "STOP!" And not a second earlier. I sitting here are the computer trying to write a claim for a malpractice that will probably kill me in the next two years or so. I am also trying to write a non-medical appeal of a decision with which I don't agree, have provided the relevant 38 CFR and 38 USC laws and regulations. None of that make one whit of difference if the person you are dealing with has what appears to have 6th grade education and no motivation what so ever to resolve the issue. I probably will not out live the FTCA claim and the odds are that I don't out live the non-medical appeal either. The nasty thing about it, is that if the VA would approve the appeal I may survive the FTCA malpractice for a longer life span. I don't think it is going to happen. The denial of my request was delivered to me by phone at 3:55 on Friday by a secretary that hadn't the faintest idea what she was talking about. Her advice was that the VA will not purchase the high flow 02 Concentrator that has been formally and officially prescribed by 5 different VAMC doctors, so I should go out and purchase it privately ($10,000 with spare filters etc. and then submit bill to the VA who would immediately reimburse me. This is a contemporary to the person who suggested that I abandon my family in Mexico and move to Arizona, lie about my address, get the equipment and then go back to Mexico with it.

We need to call out every single error that anyone from the VA makes when they make it or it will come back to bite you in the ass. I had a CT scan in Feb. 2006 which showed PAD and arthritis but the reviewer forgot to mention them. I had second CT Scan in Jan 2007 showing progression of both diseases. I was never informed of either. The conditions were never treated and no mention of them appears anywhere in my VAMC medical records. I found them by searching for the word "atherosclerosis" to help find the write ups about the three stents in coronary arteries. The 2007 CT scan report came up first and last. I demanded another CT scan to quantify the progression, if any, of the PAD. My worst fears were realized:"high grade stenoses and occlusions of infarenal aorta , calcified plaque involving the iliac vessels." I demanded an ABI which turned out to be invalid because of hardened arteries. Now I need a CT angiogram from my waist to my toes. I demanded a carotid ultrasound which my provider was elated to see that my external carotid arteries were less than 50% occluded. I demanded a critical MRI two weeks ago but it was canceled because the GS-5 whose job it was to check the pre-MRI check list couldn't read and understand my VAMC medical records. I have several pieces of metal in me that pose no danger during a MRI of my head. It is written my medical records in dozens of places, but she would not accept the records because they were on my flash drive connected to my tablet computer and not directly from the manufacturer like I was falsifying my records just in order to get the MRI which had already been ordered.

On Tuesday, I have an appointment for a cardiac echo cardiogram and a meeting with the Patient Advocate, but still no MRI even though the manufacturer faxed all the information last week. Should prove to be interesting as I have no intention or rolling over and playing dead. (However, I might end up dead any way.) I have no intention of provoking a confrontation, but I won't shy away from one either. These incompetent bastards have at the very least made what ever life I have remaining painful; but really they have shortened my lifespan by not treating the PAD when it was discovered instead of now when it has progressed up my aorta and began its synergy with the severe CAD from which I suffer. Who knows if it has spread to the arteries in my head!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use