Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sleep Apnea Claims 'abuse' Another Scam To Stop Payments

Rate this question


CaravanDan

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

That is interesting. I never did quite understand the sleep apnea issue on my husband's claim. He complained of fatigue and trouble sleeping on his initial claim (on discharge - 1998). The VA finally did a sleep study in 2003 and prescribed a CPAP machine. My husband said they did not SC the condition, but the VA provided him with the machine and supplies. I didn't know the VA provided care for non SC conditions. (My husband was retired and had Tri-Care).

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to see the lawyer writing the letter seems to think that the only disabilities people should receive benefits for are missing limbs, and even then, they should really try to keep working with missing body parts and not rely on the VA for help.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sleep Apnea can cause all kinds of problems, anywhere from heart damage to death. Sure we're not disabled if we use our CPAPs but if we stop we're back in trouble. I snored in servise, I was tired all the time and when I complained to the doctor he told me to sleep on my side. Back in the 60's and 70's we didn't kow what sleep apnea was.

As to the VA giving the vet the machine and supplies I'm glad that they do because there was no way that I could have paid the $1000 that the machine cost that my health insurance wouldn't cover, not to mention the $200 mask that you have to replace every six months.

Rick

Take nothing but pictures Leave nothing but footprints

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a NEW TREND to reduce $$Compensation$$,, If a machine keep your condition in CHECK an they claim your Good now and stop Compensation what's to say the next thing will be lets say High blood pressure,But hey your on Med's and its in CHECK,,stop those payments,,diabetes hey med's have it under control,, stop that comp,, Missing Leg,, hey here's a Prosthetic one,,they say is as good as the real thing,,Your cured,,Stop that $$$$$$$$$$$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree Dan! When they need fodder, for their cannons, they promise the world but after all is done, they forget. How any people really care about 9/11 now, honestly? They've already forgotten. I wonder if the lawyers a vet?? I kinda doubt it. VA Comp is supposed to supplement the vets income and help make up for what s/he'll lose, during his/her life due to his/her disability(s).

Many feel the same way about PTSD. Judge Judy often shows her disdain for those on disability, thru SSDI, as though it's a type of welfare. SSDI is an insurance plan that's run by the Gov't. They set up the terms and conditions for receiving it. I'm sure there are a small percentage of scammers on it but most would rather be working and could probably be earning more, if not for their disability.

Anyone who'd consider joining the service, these days, must be a few eggs short of a dozen. I don't know that I'd enlist again, in the Army, these days, based on their broken promises. Just sayin'

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick,

Did you get your sleep apnea SCed? My husband complained of constant fatigue from the time he got out of the service. It was on his initial claim. He reported he never felt rested after sleep. After a few years of telling the VA that, they finally tested him for sleep apnea. He only had a 39% sleep efficiency on the test. But with the CPAP, he had 80% efficiency. So they gave him one. But they didn't give him SC for the sleep apnea. They decided his fatigue was caused by depression. It just seems crazy. He complained of constant fatigue. So they scheduled him for a mental exam. He marked all the things on the depression inventory that related to his tiredness. (i.e. I am tired all the time. I have to push to get things done...etc) So they decided he was depressed. Is that circular reasoning or what? Then the C&P examiner diagnosed him with chronic fatigue secondary to depression. He even noted on the record that my husband had a sleep study scheduled the next day. Doesn't it seem like they would wait for the results of the sleep study before they decided what made you tired?

But unfortunately, I do partly see the point of people not being happy with the 50% sleep apnea for CPAP use. Most of the other conditions seem to rate your level of impairment after treatment; not before.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use