Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accrued Benefits - Evidence In The Record


free_spirit_etc

Question

With the standard for accrued benefits for Veteran's dying in 2007 being what was in the record as of the date of death - I am assuming that means other evidence I submit for my DIC claim (for lung cancer) can't be used in determining entitlement for accrued benefits (for my husband's pending lung cancer claim).

However, from some cases I have read it looks like the BVA sometimes still seeks a medical opinion on accrued benefits claims. So does this mean that they can ask one of their examiners to offer an opinion based on the evidence that is in the record, but I am not allowed to refute the opinion, or submit an IMO?

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yes, PR is right.....anything can be appealed regarding accrued benefits.

Also you asked :

“So does this mean that they can ask one of their examiners to offer an opinion based on the evidence that is in the record, but I am not allowed to refute the opinion, or submit and IMO? “

Yes, they should do a formal posthumous C & P exam.

There were so many issues my husband's death involved that VA did many posthumous C & P exams on his med records, ,last one was 19 years after his death , for the AO Nehmer claim I had.

In my accrued case (I will try to dig that out to see if it would help you) I had a letter from my husband's VA shrink. VA was fighting me over both of the pending claims ( Sec 1151 claim and PTSD claim for higher rating)and ignoring the evidence in my husband's C file and med recs at time of his death. I was so fed up I went right over to the local VAMC and asked his shrink for a letter I could send to the VA. Part of the problem was many psychiatric tests this shrink gave my husband were not in the actual medical record for some reason.The doctor not only told me he would prepare the letter (and 2 days later I got it in the mail ) ,he also gave me copies of the testing results he had which were nowhere in the VA med recs copy I got and told me Rod was completely unemployable due to his PTSD. I said , yeah I know and showed him my husband's SSA award solely for PTSD that VA had refused to consider.(long story and battle there) The doctor stated to VA also that I had showed him the SSA award letter for PTSD while I was in his office.

Upon receipt by the VARO, of this letter and copies I made of the psychiatric test results and the doctor's assessment statement (all done in my husband's lifetime and technically all in VA's possession) my award for Accrued benefits to include my CHAMP VA award (with a very favorable 6 year EED prior to the award date)and my DEA Chap 35 award arrived here very fast after that.

I dont know if your husband's last treating doctors would do a letter like this for you......these days you might have to get an IMO. But I sure learned this is all a war game and we MUST be aggressive in covering any possible avenue of attack. I had another evidence ace up my sleeve too, but the award letter arrived before I even needed to send that.

We have a lot of info here on accrued benefits in the DIC forum and elsewhere here. I want to just run down the regs again for anyone reading this.

Also this is a BVA decision from 2013 ,

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files2/1316146.txt

that also shows how they apply the rules for accrued.(for non Nehmer claims) The widow was denied but denials have as much info as awards from the BVA do.I have learned plenty from BVA denials.

DIC claims (non Nehmer) filed within one year of the veteran's death, have the date of that death as the EED on a successful DIC award.

Nehmer accrued is different and is explained in our AO forum here and also in the Nehmer Training Guide here dated 2010 from NVLSP.

A Non Nehmer claim could certainly become a Nehmer claim and has for many survivors under the 2010 Nehmer regulations.

Non Nehmer accrued claims are explained in detail here:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDUQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benefits.va.gov%2Fwarms%2Fdocs%2Fadmin21%2Fm21_1%2Fmr%2Fpart8%2Fch01%2Fch01.doc&ei=gIdFUoWDOcfi2AXPgIEY&usg=AFQjCNEy3ejEN3pjLdexy1REMEialZWHlg&bvm=bv.53217764,d.b2I

Evidence is described in above link as:

Evidence in VA’s possession means evidence physically located at any VA facility, including, but not limited to

  • VA regional offices

  • VA insurance centers

  • VA medical centers

  • VA outpatient clinics

  • Vet Centers, and

  • the Records Management Center.

Note: Evidence in VA’s possession does not include Federal court records.”

Also important for non Nehmer accrued:

“On the notification document, state the

  • approximate amount of accrued benefits due and payable, if known, on the notification document, and

  • time limit in which the application (VA Form 21-534 or 21-535) must be filed.

Reference: For more information on the required time limits for application for accrued benefits, see M21-1MR, Part VIII, 2.1.d.”

accrued benefits are payable other than

the application must be filed within one year of the veteran’s death.

And

“A separate claim for accrued benefits is required if a claim cannot be initiated on

  • VA Form 21-534, or

  • VA Form 21-535.

Note: Issues on appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) at the date of any claimant’s death are in a pending status and accrued benefits applications must be sent to the proper person or persons.

Reference: For more information on when to send accrued benefit applications, see De Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42 (1994).”

source : M21-1MR, Part VIII, Chapter 2

I mention all of above in case anyone sees here that the date of your husband's death was in 2007.

Meaning he had to have a claim pending at that time with the VA and that you re-opened his claim within one year of his death, which is usually done by surtvivors as part of the 21-534 DIC application.

And that you have continuously been prosecuting the DIC and accrued benefits claim ever since.

The citation to 38 CFR 3.1001 above does not apply, as far as I can tell to your case.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Since the decision is supposed to be made upon the evidence that was in the record (or in the VA's constructive possession) on the date of his death - I wasn't sure if they sought medical opinions or if it could only be made on exactly what is in the record. But it looks like they can seek medical opinions, asking the VA examiners to offer an opinion based on the evidence in the record. So maybe it just means I can't submit more private medical records, buddy statements, etc. etc.

So I guess the IMOs I submitted for my DIC claim don't have to be considered for the accrued benefits claim - as they were submitted after his death? But if they seek a VA opinion, then I have the right to submit an IMO that refutes that opinion (of the opinion isn't favorable)?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This case is one where I questioned the medical opinion for accrued benefits

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files2/1119220.txt

In this case, the veteran died in 2005 with an active claim for lung cancer. The widow was granted DIC based on the VHA expert's 2011 opinion. However, she was denied accrued benefits because the record as of the date of his death did not support the claim. They didn't consider the VHA expert's opinion to affect the accrued benefits claim. I guess because it was issued after his death.

So I was still unclear whether medical opinions submitted after death would be considered evidence (i.e. if they are submitted after the death - they don't count for accrued benefits) or considered part of the duty to assist (i.e. the VA obtaining an opinion, if necessary, to help them decide the claim).

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

It looks like in your accrued benefits claim for an earlier effective date you presented VA records. So that would mean that even though those were not actually IN his record at the time of his death, they were in the "constructive possession" of the VA at the time of his death.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay.. I looked at the link you provided http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/view.jsp?FV=http://www.va.gov/vetapp13/Files2/1316146.txt

and it says:

"Generally, the Board would remand this case to obtain an adequate VA examiner's opinion; however, because this claim is solely for the purpose of accrued benefits, the Board is not permitted to undertake development subsequent to the Veteran's death. Therefore, based on the evidence of record at the time of the Veteran's death, the Board finds that the preponderance of the evidence weighs against a finding of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD, for accrued benefits purposes."

So I am still not sure that the VA will seek or use an medical opinions obtained after his death for accrued benefits -- even an opinion they seek (i.e. for DIC).

I am really trying to figure this out to see if I need to build an argument for the case that the evidence in the record at the time of his death also supports the claim.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use