Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal For Increase Caused A Cnp For Mentla Health Condition Secondary In 2007

Rate this question


KDM

Question

I filed a claim in 2003 and was rated zero percent I appealed, In 2004 i was denied an increase for the initial non compensable claim and remained at zero then a secodary condtion was added at Zero Percent in 2004 in the SSOC and I appealed both decisions for a compensable rating.

In 2007 3 years later I was given a CNP due to a remand based on the appeal from 2004, for some other secondary conditions considered increases.

I was denied some CNPs and SSOC where sent out, but one case in 2007 the mental health diagnosis I was deemed fifty fifty probabilty which goes in the Veterans favor but no SSOC or SOC was sent out stating any ramifications its was like they acted as if it did not exist this CNP.

Flash forward I am now at the VSO level of this appeal that has been remanded twice the last time was in July 30 2013 and they stated in the remand that they have to look at the evidence from this 2007 CNP that no SSOC or SOC was sent out to me and that they must send me a SSOC or SOC about this 2007 case the AMC must have denied every thing cause it went back to the BVA who sent it to the VLJ who sent it to the VSO for written arguments but still I have no SSOC or SOC from the Remand from 2013 July or as stated in the remand no SSOC or SOC for the 2007 CNP for depression secondary to the initial claim this is where the Doctot stated in 2007 it is as Least likely as Not that my depression stems from my service connected disability.

How due I fight this what is the statute of law I can use to combat them on not sending me a SSOC or SOC on the 2007 CNP or is the BVA going to deal with this now?

My VSO said that they will force them to look at it how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Your not going to like the answer, but they way they "force" them to do it, is to send it back for them to do it right. If they still don't fufill the requirements of the remand (and they realize it), they will then remand it again. You get to keep spinning on your little hamster wheel, everyone keeps thier job, no-one gets a note in their personnel file, everyone gets bonuses, and very soon the Secretary is going to publicly congratulate the VA on "breaking the back of the backlog"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Do whatever you must because things may get harder as Iraq and Afghanistan vanish in the rear view mirror. Hire a lawyer if you must but keep going. Consider that every OIF/OEF vet is probably going to file a claim in the near future as they begin to realize how the government made chumps out of them. The only revenge is to make the USA pay you.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

Im with you all the way. When I first became disabled while on Active Duty, I was embarrassed. A Dr. told me " If you don't get what you deserve some lazy bum is going to get that free money, while you suffer"

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use