Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vas Knowledge Of Disease Vs. Claim Date

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

If there is evidence in a vets medical file regarding DMII and the VA didn't do anything about it. And then a few years later the VA treats and diagnoses the vet, and the vet then files a claim for the DMII. Will the compensation be from the date of the claim or from the date the VA first knew about the DMII?

I suspect it is from the actual file date but was curious. Thanks for your imput.

Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest jangrin

Thats what the problem is. Evidently they did nothing no tests, no follow-up. This is why I'm not sure if there is anything we can do.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have copies of all his labs done at the VA? Even before 02. There has to be a link somewhere unless they wrote it down and realized they made a mistake. Given the assembly line health care in mass quantaties, There has to be utter confusion. and I may say, Before the VISTA system There was a bunch of stuff just plain lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

unfortunately, prior to my husband being dx w/ DMII in Oct 2005-the only other times he was at the VA was-

for a knee injury in about 2000 he was seen once for a surgical consult referral.

and then once in 2002-this was for a testicular cancer exam-this is when they had two to notations about DMII but nothing else.

He wasn't seen again until he was having severe problems in Oct 2005 then he was dx all at once with DMII, HBP,HTN, CAD. all dx within 4 to 8 weeks.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any time he had blood work done- annual physical, whatever they saw him for---

there will be a Blood Chemistry Report.

It will show the glucose values and then show the normal values on the right hand side.

Look at the bottom for HBIac -that too would be a glucose reading-if he ever had this done

A high Creatinine reading and also anything high in the Tryglyc/chol range can( can not always) show beginnings of diabetes,

also high Triglceride readings should be followed up with lipid specimens-in many cases.A high hypertriglceride hypothesis can mean heart disease-

I am not a doctor- what I saw was circled and checked abnormal values- and at the bottom of blood chem reports indications further tests would be done- they never were done-

it took me months to realise what "RO/CAD" meant in 1995-

"follow up on CAD" ---rule out heart disease-follow up to be done on CAD tests-never happened-

Also the Urinalysis results can show potential diabetes-

I studed until I understood every single chem report symbol, value and med entry in my husband's records.

Doctor's entries like the one your mentioned can also help prove a claim like this-in your case-

VA tried to tell me that my assessment of numerous medical symbols and entries was inaccurate-

I knocked that down-I said they were wrong as I use Medilexicon and the same acronyms that are used in the standard medical community. The VA cannot make up some new meaning of a known medical acronym just to deny anyone's claim.

More than anything else it was learning what the medical abbrevs and acronyms meant that got me FTCA /1151 award and got me my three IMOs that support my present AO claim in VA doctors note and entries.

Again this is hard work-I suggest getting an IMO to anyone who wonders if their care has been proper.

I bet the VA saves many more lives then they mess up-but with the stress they are all under, (the docs too) I think it is more than likely they are misdiagnosing veterans more then ever before.

Especially veterans with DMII.

The VA treats symptoms and does not-in each case-look for cause-

Diabetes can become expensive for VA-

I really believe they hoped Rod would die and I would not find out what really killed him- because they sure saved money on his eventual care-but they paid it anyhow when I sued them.

You certainly should first question the doctor who made that notation and try to get his response in writing.

This is good-I tried to contact a VA doctor months ago at the Syracuse VA.

His sec said by email he would read my letter when he returned from vacation.

Then the VAMC wrote and said he had retired and left the VA . He never got the letter?

He is still performing C & Ps for the VA.I just found that out-

He won't answer what I asked him-he cant-

They will get away with anything you allow them too and you must question the doctors if the care doesn't seem right.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use