Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

All Veterans, Filing A Nod At The Last Minute.

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

I just want to inform all veterans that filing a NOD at the last minute may hurt your claim. It seems to me that more and more VAROs are taking more then 21 days to get new correspondence in the VA system. I have seem that it is taking 60 to 90 days to get new evidence logged in. I know it takes time to get evidence to support your claims but don't wait. Lots of veterans are getting denial letters when they have submitted new evidence that seem to be lost in the mail or in the system.

Hope this helps.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

In my case, the RO is trying to say that the date they stamped the green return receipt card was the date the NOD was filed, not the postmark date per the CFR. I'd be all done if I hadn't sent it certified mail from the mail counter with a hand stamped postmark on the certified mail receipt itself along with the cash register slip. We're in the midst of getting this straighted out now.

curious did you cut it that close? was the post mark your expiration date for the NOD? To my knowledge they are to go by the post mark date. With evidence or any forms with suspense dates it is absolutely imperative that you send it certified, return receipt requested. They pull that crap all the time on so many people to include myself. It took me once to learn that lesson. It costs a little bit, however, it is a small price to pay to nail that crap they try to pull to the floor.

My suggestion is if you haven't done so already is to send them a copy of the return receipt along with the excerpt of the regulation, that will piss them off, however, it is the regulation, they can go suck an egg. :tongue:

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would just never cut it that close on filing a NOD. If you are asking them to reconsider your claim don't wait for less than a month to file the NOD. I may have lost a few hundred thousand bucks for not filing a NOD on time and letting a claim become final. This was long ago and far away in a distant galaxy but it still affects me today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

curious did you cut it that close? was the post mark your expiration date for the NOD? To my knowledge they are to go by the post mark date. With evidence or any forms with suspense dates it is absolutely imperative that you send it certified, return receipt requested. They pull that crap all the time on so many people to include myself. It took me once to learn that lesson. It costs a little bit, however, it is a small price to pay to nail that crap they try to pull to the floor.

My suggestion is if you haven't done so already is to send them a copy of the return receipt along with the excerpt of the regulation, that will piss them off, however, it is the regulation, they can go suck an egg. :tongue:

I would just never cut it that close on filing a NOD. If you are asking them to reconsider your claim don't wait for less than a month to file the NOD. I may have lost a few hundred thousand bucks for not filing a NOD on time and letting a claim become final. This was long ago and far away in a distant galaxy but it still affects me today.

You both are quite wise. I wish I hadn't sent it that late - it was on the deadline. Between my SC conditions, Christmas, and an ongoing family crisis at the time, I simply ran out of time. I'd been trying to get to it for months. Also, however, I was hoping against the odds that the "reconsideration claim" I was talked into submitting would come through at the last minute. So I felt that I was trapped into having to submit the NOD in order to save the original claim date. In hindsight, I would have submitted a NOD rather than that other claim. But given the situation as it stood this past fall, I would have submitted it a couple of weeks before Christmas if I had to do over again.

At least I listened to some of the great advice here. The package was sent certified mail, return receipt requested. So I do have ample evidence that the NOD was submitted on time. And I've submitted this proof twice now. The NOD was lost somewhere in the system and in mid-March, learned through IRIS that it was never received. So I sent the NOD again with the proof of postmark. Then, earlier this month, I got a letter responding to one of the submissions (original one or the one in March, don't know which one). The RO claimed I'd submitted a statement in support of a claim rather than a NOD and that it was late anyway as "officially" logged in as received about two weeks after the deadline. "No, no, no!" I responded immediately and in writing (also sent certified mail....yeah, it costs a few bucks but it's like insurance). I pointed out that I had filed a NOD and even used the new version of the NOD form, sending them yet another copy. And I gave them another copy of my hand postmarked certified receipt while quoting 38 CFR 20.302(a) and 38 CFR 20.305(a) about the use of the postmark as the date filed (thanks again to a number of hadit folks who helped me quickly put together a response).

Edited by TiredCoastie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had one misreading of the decision date and award date in my case. I was off by a couple of weeks but I caught the error in time. My second delay was trying to get my IMO/IME worked out. I am confident on my mailing however, certified return receipt requested. As I have the stamped receipt for proof they received it in time and the IME report will be sent this week. I know all too well of the distractions of life, they can cost you big time if you are not careful.

IRIS inquiries can be quite helpful, it's an electronic record that can be referenced when need be.

The VA is hating life right now. With all the inquiries and heads rolling they are going to be watching more carefully the crap they try to pull. Also Veterans are getting much wiser and are more serious of an adversary with technology, support sites and forums like Hadit. Knowledge is power. The willingness to fight to the end is another key.

Fight till your last breath!

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use