Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue?

Rate this question


dougbo1943

Question

I was service connected and rated 0% in Feb. 1982 for left medial meniscectomy. I received my C file today and a copy of the my military medical record was included. It clearly showed a left medial meniscectomy while in service and the VA acknowledged it when they SC it and assigned 0%.

They used diagnostic code 5259 "Cartilage, semilinar, removal of, symptomatic.............10%. The way I read Appendix A to Part 4 the code has not changed since 1946.

Should I Cue it or ask them to reconsider the claim.

Thanks

Gunny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

If they lowballed a decision and you meet the criteria for the 10 percent rating, Then you should file a cue claim based on the fact the VA did not follow the correct rating procedures in the original claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Gunny,

In your case it probably isn't CUE. According to the rating schedule, there isn't a specific Diagnostic Code (DC) for removal of meniscus, so the VA assigns a DC that most closely represents your condition. In your case removal of the cartlidge. Evaluations of medical evidence and assigning a particular evaluation is a judgmental call made by the rating board. This is purely a judgemental call on the rating specialist and judgmental calls, however bad they may be, are not CUE's.

If according to the C&P exam you had stated a limited range of motion that warranted a higher evaluation under one of the other Diagnostic Codes for the knee, then the VA should have awarded the higher evaluation and assigned the other DC. However, this still does not constitue a CUE. If that was the case, you should have appealed it within the one year from the decision.

Here is an exerpt from the CUE criteria.

"Examples of situations that are not CUE error are; a changed diagnosis that "corrects" an earlier diagnosis; the Secretary's failure to fulfill the Duty to Assist (DTA); evaluation of evidence (a disagreement as to how the facts were weighed or evalutaed and a change in interpretayion. Clear and Unmistakable error does not include the otherwise correct application of a statute or regulation where, subsequent to the Board decision challenged, there has been a change in the interpretation of the statute or regulation."

Vike 17

Edited by Vike17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we're talking about the meniscus, I have no meniscus in either knee due to osteoarthritis. Last May I got three shots of Synvisc http://www.synvisc.com/ in both knees. They made my knees very stiff, but after awhile I really appreciated the shots. My knees don't bang together as much. The shots seem to be wearing off now, and I'll ask my Ortho (Not VA) doc if I can get another set of shots as soon as I get back to Florida.

Edited by Rich T

IC/1 Navy, 100% Schedular + SMC, Shellback, Blue Nose, Crossed International Dateline and Prime Meridian.

II Corinthians 5:17 "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VBM says that CUE is a rare type of error in law so what we may see as a blatant error may not pass the VA's CUE test. However, you don't know until you try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use