Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Hearing - What's It Like? Plan Of Attack?

Rate this question


K9MAL

Question

I have a DRO hearing on the 6th. I've read a few different things online but was wondering who else might have some input? Just curious, do you argue your case or just present facts? Is it a back and forth type conversation or just cut & dry? What's it like?

Do you lead off with questions? As an example: Why was my increase denied? What evidence do I need to prove my claim?

Or, do you just lay out the evidence that contradicts their "reasons and bases" for denial and call it a day? Are they typically pro-veteran and understanding or can I expect to have my blood pressure rise?

Happy New Year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

K9: Had a very good DRO Official Hearing 06/27/14. 1st and only one I've had since filing my First NOD in 2010. Get there early and plan to stay late. They schedule quite a few Hearings for same date and time due to failure to appear of many Vets, hard to believe Vets don't show after waiting so long. After you sign in, report to your VSO's office to meet with the VSO Hearing Rep. I spent about 20 min with him reviewing my position before we were called for my Hearing. Turned out my Rep was a Retired DRO who had worked with the DRO that was hearing my case.

Hearing started off with intro's all around. DRO explained this was a official Hearing that would be Recorded and Transcribed and that I would get a copy of the transcription in about a YEAR and be informed of his Decision sometime in "Near Future." At that point I asked about my official request that I had made in early 14 regarding an informal DRO conference. His reply was, "I could have an Informal Hearing or the Standard Hearing, up to me." He also told me that in the Formal, he would state the Issues covered by the NOD, I would present any New Evidence that wasn't in my file, he might ask some questions and then I would have to wait for his official ruling which could be appealed to the BVA. He told me if I chose the "Informal Hearing," he and I would discuss my case without the Recording and Transcription and I would probably have a Decision before I left. I chose the Informal Hearing. Best move I ever made! Not only did he hear my Scheduled 2010 NOD, he decided a 2012 NOD for IU. After about 35 min, I left knowing he had Awarded all major $$ issues from both NOD's. A Very Good Day for Me. One other thing, he said that if at any time during the "Informal Hearing" I decided I wanted to go Back on the Record, he would start recording for transcription and the Hearing would become the Regular Type Hearing. I asked him if he started recording, could I and placed my recorder on the table. He said "No Problem." At 3:30 that afternoon, I received a call from my VSO-Rep, He had the Official DRO Award Decision on his desk. Retro check hit my bank around 07/22/14 a couple days before the Big Brown VA Award Envelope arrived.

Good Luck

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with Gastone good advise!

When I had my DRO Hearing it was not bad I was nervous at first but after we got going it was not bad at all

This is your chance to tell them in person about yourself and present your evidence and anything favorable to your claim

Remember to Thank the DRO for allowing you to be there and state your case/issues.

Always be well Mannerd

I was also luckly and got a great understanding DRO and a Rating Specialist at my Hearing.

Also remember a DRO can make his/her decision then and expedite your claim.

DRO hearings are usually good.

Hang in there buddy you will do fine!

Good Luck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

After you sign in, report to your VSO's office to meet with the VSO Hearing Rep. I spent about 20 min with him reviewing my position before we were called for my Hearing. Turned out my Rep was a Retired DRO who had worked with the DRO that was hearing my case.

I called my VSO's office last week and have yet to hear a reply. I'm assuming I just speak to the person when I get there as you did.

Hearing started off with intro's all around. DRO explained this was a official Hearing that would be Recorded and Transcribed and that I would get a copy of the transcription in about a YEAR and be informed of his Decision sometime in "Near Future." At that point I asked about my official request that I had made in early 14 regarding an informal DRO conference. His reply was, "I could have an Informal Hearing or the Standard Hearing, up to me." He also told me that in the Formal, he would state the Issues covered by the NOD, I would present any New Evidence that wasn't in my file, he might ask some questions and then I would have to wait for his official ruling which could be appealed to the BVA. He told me if I chose the "Informal Hearing," he and I would discuss my case without the Recording and Transcription and I would probably have a Decision before I left. I chose the Informal Hearing. Best move I ever made! Not only did he hear my Scheduled 2010 NOD, he decided a 2012 NOD for IU. After about 35 min, I left knowing he had Awarded all major $$ issues from both NOD's. A Very Good Day for Me.

It sounds like the informal hearing may be the way to go for myself as well. I have the issues I need addressed in my NOD and I also have another earlier effective date I'd like to argue that I neglected to enter into the NOD. Funny thing is I have until February to file the EED NOD, if he doesn't want to address it, due to emailing Bob and getting a DRO in record time.

I appreciate you laying this all out for me. I've been reading, reading and documenting, laying out a brief, etc. trying to get everything dialed in before I get there. I'm really stressing about it because if my NOD is approved it'll put me at 100% schedular. And, if you combine the NOD with the EED, if both are successful, I'll be looking at $50k plus in retro which would really save my bacon at this point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When I had my DRO Hearing it was not bad I was nervous at first but after we got going it was not bad at all

This is your chance to tell them in person about yourself and present your evidence and anything favorable to your claim

Remember to Thank the DRO for allowing you to be there and state your case/issues.

Always be well Mannerd

I was also luckly and got a great understanding DRO and a Rating Specialist at my Hearing.

Also remember a DRO can make his/her decision then and expedite your claim.

DRO hearings are usually good.

Thanks for your input as well. This DRO is HUGE for me and I'm very anxious and nervous about the whole ordeal. I've spent hours and hours researching, gathering documents and writing my explanations, briefs, etc... I feel like I could be a frickin' attorney at this point in time and I haven't heard squat from the VFW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

K9: The DRO will only address those specific issues that were NOD'd. My 1st NOD had an issue of Peripheral Neuropathy that my VSO Rep listed as in my hands. Never was, but due to the fact that the original claim & Denial stated upper Extremities, the DRO couldn't address my PN of my feet. Said I should have filed a new claim for the PN Lower Extremity as soon as I realized the error. No big Retro $$ issue so I canceled my NOD of that issue and immediately refiled another claim when I left the Hearing. That's with full knowledge that I had just been awarded All major $$ issues from 2010 an IU from 2012.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use