Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Many Times Have You Appealed To The Bva With The Same Docket Number?

Rate this question


lotzaspotz

Question

My husband has appeals pending that were first filed in 1994. Along the way, several were granted by the BVA, many were remanded only to result in the RO either not following up with yet another C & P exam for a couple of years each time, or not answering the BVA's questions, which resulted in numerous repeated remands for the same issues. We've also been to the CAVC after BVA denials, which resulted in remands for the same issues, and then after that, got caught up yet again in the previously described hamster wheel. This got me to wondering how many times we've been to the BVA with the same issues covered in the same Docket number. For us it was TEN TIMES since the first BVA decision in 2001, and we're still at it.

Just wondering about everyone else's experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Broncovet, nothing you could appeal to the CAVC? Or are you still waiting for a CAVC decision? The BVA has to do something eventually. How did the BVA reconcile the discrepancy?

Did you argue the benefit of the doubt going to you?

Edited by lotzaspotz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

LOTZA: Still jerking around with the BVA since 94? Is there a pile of Retro $$s at the end of your train ride? After all this time, am I correct in assuming (bad thing to do) that you have availed yourself of a few (3) or more VA Accredited Appeals Attorney's opinions? If the Retro Blood is in the water, the Law Sharks will beat down your door. At the very least, 3 free legal consults might give you a plan of attack, it did for me. I never had to use the BVA but after 3 legal consults, I felt confident with my 06/14 DRO Hearing. All major $$ issues from 10 & 12 NODs awarded. Two of the National Law Firms wanted me to cancel the DRO and let them proceed to the BVA. The 1 local VA Attorney agreed with me on the DRO. I didn't sign with her but had I lost, she would have been my choice for Rep at BVA. Legal consults took place 02/14, DRO Hearing notification 05/4/14. Close to 4 years or so from 2010 NOD, BVA would have been at least another yr or so. You definitely have to pack a lunch when appealing a claim.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone, no kidding!

My husband is 100% scheduler rated effective February 1997, a recent decision changed from an effective date of August 2003, which we had to fight years to get, bit by bit. Our issue is he should have been rated such from initial date of claim back in 1994. So we've been entrenched in that disagreement for quite awhile now. Remember the limitations on attorney representation on issues appealed prior to 2007 until you reached the CAVC, so that affected us too. We filed a writ petition to blast it out of the AMC at one point, which worked, but ended up back at the CAVC, and then back to the BVA, etc. See what I mean?

Anytime we reached the CAVC, we did so with attorney representation. I don't believe in going there pro se. I also haven't had any luck with the DRO process down here. Waste of time, cut and paste denials all over again. As Berta says, the RO can't read. However, I believe in many cases, the BVA can't read, either. I talked to Ron a few years ago at NVLSP. They were not interested, and to tell you the truth, it's difficult to expect anyone else to have the same level of interest as I did in our situation, so I did understand that they have more significant precedent-setting cases to represent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If they keep hamstering you, it may be time for another Writ-most especially if you've been up the ladder to the CAVC already. I'm doing my very best poltergeist imitation (Heeeeee's Baaaaaaaaaaack) there as we speak. #15-112.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

With the same judge as my husband's been assigned, too. Judge Davis. 14-87. A lot of cases that are not writ petitions with numbers assigned long after my husband's have already been heard. Each judge works at his or her own pace I guess, but Judge Davis was assigned last October. Thinking it should be anytime now. Good luck to you Alex. It's a whopper of a writ petition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use