Husband recently awarded 50% for adjustment disorder. C&p for this was originally for PTSD which the examiner decided was the adjustment disorder instead. Seem that when he decided it was not PTSD, he stopped as far as symptoms were concerned. He did not include a symptom list in the c&p. In the award letter, it listed the symptoms required to be at the next level. My husband has at least five of the eight symptoms and he is being treated for them and they are noted all through his treatment records. The rater said they considered the treatment records. If so, how could they miss the 70% mark?
Would like to file a reconsideration/reopen to avoid the long time of a NOD. I know some don't like that option but it has worked well for us before and we have plenty of time before the year is up. But, since the VA says they considered the treatment records, obviously we cannot use that as new and material evidence. Is there another option?
Also, we would like to file for TDIU but my husband just recently left his job. He tried working part time for two years after being diagnosed with kidney disease but even that became impossible due to edema and fatigue. The only medical statement he has to back that up is a statement from the c&p doctor that work Ability is limited due to edema. His kidney doctors office manager will not allow him to state anything due to legal fears. Would the c&p statement be enough? He is already on regular social security which he took early due to health.
Then there is the fear of VA reducing the rating when something new is filed. Or is this unlikely due to the rating being so recent? Silly that veterans even have to worry about that....
Question
kate7772
Husband recently awarded 50% for adjustment disorder. C&p for this was originally for PTSD which the examiner decided was the adjustment disorder instead. Seem that when he decided it was not PTSD, he stopped as far as symptoms were concerned. He did not include a symptom list in the c&p. In the award letter, it listed the symptoms required to be at the next level. My husband has at least five of the eight symptoms and he is being treated for them and they are noted all through his treatment records. The rater said they considered the treatment records. If so, how could they miss the 70% mark?
Would like to file a reconsideration/reopen to avoid the long time of a NOD. I know some don't like that option but it has worked well for us before and we have plenty of time before the year is up. But, since the VA says they considered the treatment records, obviously we cannot use that as new and material evidence. Is there another option?
Also, we would like to file for TDIU but my husband just recently left his job. He tried working part time for two years after being diagnosed with kidney disease but even that became impossible due to edema and fatigue. The only medical statement he has to back that up is a statement from the c&p doctor that work Ability is limited due to edema. His kidney doctors office manager will not allow him to state anything due to legal fears. Would the c&p statement be enough? He is already on regular social security which he took early due to health.
Then there is the fear of VA reducing the rating when something new is filed. Or is this unlikely due to the rating being so recent? Silly that veterans even have to worry about that....
Any thoughts on how to proceed?
Thanks
Kate
Edited by kate7772Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
4
3
2
Popular Days
Feb 21
14
Feb 22
6
Top Posters For This Question
kate7772 6 posts
Berta 4 posts
FormerMember 3 posts
Buck52 2 posts
Popular Days
Feb 21 2015
14 posts
Feb 22 2015
6 posts
Popular Posts
FormerMember
If you are doing your claim yourself ( without a VSO or lawyer) there is a little known trick hidden within Comer v. Peake. You are deemed mentally insufficient to be a lawyer and have no training. As
Berta
That is Wonderful News Kate..... as I have said here many times, often vets lock themselves into PTSD, and are denied when ,if they file for adjustment disorder or any other MH issues they have a bett
FormerMember
Simple. Get a new nexus letter that restates the theory based on the existing medical evidence. On appeal, VA would be forced, in the existing claim, to defend their Examiner's logic and nexus. If th
19 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now