Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Partial Success/dro Hearing Finalized Pending Claim/appealed Issues Being Decided In Estimated 30Days

Rate this topic


ArNG11

Recommended Posts

Well I received the official decision on my NOD today via snail mail. Although I knew the results from my rain maker and the effective date before I got this I'm still left wondering if this decision is correct. My agreement with the decision is that I had a back injury in service, active service made it worse, I filed a claim and am entitled to benefits. The exception is the amount of the rating and when I was entitled to it. I am not satisfied with it. Not because I am being greedy, but because it is contradicting regulation and law. The evidence is there. The service connection is there. My injury was an injury sustained in Guard service during pre deployment training. My injury was made worse during the course of train up and active military Title 10 orders. One year of active military service in Iraq. I have continuity of treatment and documented medical evidence that the injury has worsened. Not by one or two doctors but several medical professionals.

Reading and I'll admit, obsessing, about the results of my battles. Hell even doubting my rain maker. I feel like and believe that I am or at least he is stating not to rock the boat, to take what they are offering or it can cause problems. I feel like this in every bit of my bones and being is an incorrect rating and decision.

The results are as such:

Lumbar spine, degenerative spondylosis and vertebral body compression deformity L1. Old percent assigned 10%. New percent assigned 20%. Effective date May 20th 2014. Not paying attention to my other claims as they should not have any bearing on the decision that was made in 2013 regarding my back. I can literally argue every point in which the reasons for the afforded ratings are wrong and contradict regulation and law. It goes against what the evidence indicated at the time the decision was made and the evidence the VA had at the time of making the decision.

I feel that I was entitled to the 20% on my back from the submission of my back claim in 2012 and that in the time of appeals and multiple claims, an entitlement to 40% effective from 20 May 2014 would be deserving according to the evidence and results from private back, nerve DBQ's, and Functional Capacity exams for my back.

I am asking for brutally honest opinions here. I would like a no BS assessment of the rating criteria as I've read it at least a few hundred times. I am obsessed, yes, no doubt about it. But I have this gut feeling, a feeling like I had when I was in the dessert, before we got hit and the alarms went off. That I should be fighting for more than the decision afforded to me at the time. Oh one more detail. I've been advised by my rain maker, a respectable entity in our fights against the VA, not to pursue this. To leave the back claim alone.

Have at it Hadit. Fire at will. Destroy my claim and stance.

I know that we all respect each other here, or at least try to. So I am asking to hit this like you were a VA rater and decision maker trying to deny the claim.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Thadline long time no hear. Thanks. Hope all is well with you. How have things gone?

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all need to appreciate what wins we receive. I'm the same way, when I'm down, pain not being controlled, reading about other people's wins helps even if briefly so.

Edited by ArNG11

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but a win for you is a win for me. I'm happy that everyone is getting wins - I'm keeping hope alive on my end too but at least good news is happening around me. My day will come - for now let's celebrate your win!!!! :smile::smile::smile:

Thadine Q.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use