Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bva Going Backwards On Ebenefits?

Rate this question


RickH

Question

Hi all, On 3/242015 my case was on stage 2 prep, then it was sent to stage 3 VSO, it stayed there

less than a day and was sent to stage 4 with veteran law judge(VLJ), today it was sent back to stage 3 VSO.

Does anyone know what going on? I had filled out the attachment asking that it not go back to the RO, and be

sent for decision to the VLJ. where did this this cheese wheel come from?

Thanks, RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Same thing going on with mine but mine has been with the VSO since April 8th and has not moved back. Also VSO has not contacted me and I have go to the board 1st of June?

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

stillhere, I would call your VSO at the BVA location and find out whats going on. Did you ask for a waiver of RO

when you got your SSOC?

RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It seems you guys have Major Veterans Service Organizations representing you, correct? At the BVA, there are eight or so "Go" teams of VSO reps made up of the different groups of VSOs. Hence, one VSO team may consist of a VFW guy, two MOPHers and a AmLeg rep. They take turns chasing deficiencies in the claims evidence. Many VAROs ship your claims out to the BVA without including important SSA documents even though they are not supposed to. That provokes a remand. However, here "with VSO" doesn't mean it went back to your regional office. They could be trying to make sure an inferred claim is included or they could be horsetrading with the Staff attorney of the VLJ. I've seen them give away some of your claim in order to get some granted. That doesn't help you but they do it. If they send it back to the RO on remand, chances are they found a big uh-oh. It usually goes through the AMC. If you do not see those words, it's being "redeveloped" for optimal consideration at the BVA.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Asknod on my claim I asked to waive the RO, it was at the VLJ first and my claim was sent to the legion office at the BVA for less then a day

and was then sent back to the VLJ, a month later it was sent back to the VSO again?

RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Asknod I forgot to mention it went to the VSO the second time for argument preparation but I had already

submitted my own argument after the SSOC.

RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Surprise, surprise surprise, RickH. Did you know that when you hand over that POA to the VSO, they control the vertical as well as the horizontal--without you. They rarely get back to you to discuss the shortcomings, whether you do or do not have an IMO or nexus letter or a Buddy letter with no DD 214 attached. If it's missing, you find out when you lose. They write the last letters of rebuttal. They get to make your final argument.

To give you an example, In 1991 on appeal to the BVA, the DAV chowderhead VSO team made up of the creame of the crop of 2 DAVs, VFW and a Red Cross dude argued not that my Air America records were not associated with the STRs but for the benefit of the doubt under 38 CFR 3.102. That was it. I found that out when I got my c-file in 2009. All this time I believed my local rep here in Seattle who said they tried to get the records. They lied. I got 0% for Hearing in left ear only and 0% for tinnitus. They traded in my back claim for two 0% ratings. Nobody asked me.

That is the major difference between a VSO and a lawyer. The lawyer won't sell you down the river and make a deal with the devil without consulting you first. Why? Because you, not the US Govt., is paying him. Get it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use