Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Granted Prostate Cancer Service Connection, What Next?

Rate this question


RickH

Question

Hi all

Got the BVA letter yesterday, it stated that because of the new probative evidence(IMO-IME) that

exposure to work place chemicals was evident and my service connection for prostate

cancer was warranted and granted.

In my original claim, I had filed for Prostate cancer residules, but no where in the letter

does it talk about residules or secondaries.

I had my prostate removed in 2001, my original claim was filed in 2007. Will the rater

at the RO know enough to go to the secondaries on the DBQ that their doc filled out at my

C and P, or will I have NOD them to it?

I can't scan copies because I' m in FLA visiting friends for the next 4 weeks, my granddaughter

read me the letters.

Thanks,

RickH

Am I being paranoid??

Edited by RickH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm just worried that they will give me a 0% because the

cancer is now gone, now that the prostate is gone, and the

VLG never mentioned my secondarys.

RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Good question and Im sure knowledgeable HADIT members will chime in.

Are there any residuals from the prostate removal? Scar, pain, tenderness, etc.

"NEVER GIVE UP"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If your treatment is done, you should be rated for residual. First you should apply for loss of organ (prostate). Then you can be rated for incontinence and/or impotence. You also should be eligible for all meds concerning the above disabilities. You can be rated for pain, scaring, loss of use.

Have someone who is a vet rep (I.e. Veterans of Foreign Wars, local county vet rep) help you file the claims. Since your prostate loss is service connected, watch for secondary problems down the road like bladder problems, cancer cells in the blood etc.

I ended up losing prostate, bladder, gall bladder, and most of the colon. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

JON, I'm past all that, this was an appeal decision after my BVA hearing

with a VLJ. My original claim(2007) was asking for the residuals you mentioned.

RickH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

SMC K does not provide for Loss of or loss of use of Prostate. If you become impotent, the provisions for loss of use of a creative organ would be for application. Here's the spec sheet for peeing problems.

Rate particular condition as urine leakage, frequency, or obstructed voiding

Continual Urine Leakage, Post Surgical Urinary Diversion, Urinary Incontinence, or Stress Incontinence:

Requiring the use of an appliance or the wearing of absorbent materials which must be changed more than 4 times per day 60%

Requiring the wearing of absorbent materials which must be changed 2 to 4 times per day 40 %

Requiring the wearing of absorbent materials which must be changed less than 2 times per day 20%

Urinary frequency:

Daytime voiding interval less than one hour, or; awakening to void five or more times per night 40 %

Daytime voiding interval between one and two hours, or; awakening to void three to four times per night 20 %

Daytime voiding interval between two and three hours, or; awakening to void two times per night 10 %

Obstructed voiding:

Urinary retention requiring intermittent or continuous catheterization 30%

Marked obstructive symptomatology (hesitancy, slow or weak stream, decreased force of stream) with any one or combination of the following:

1. Post void residuals greater than 150 cc.

2. Uroflowmetry; markedly diminished peak flow rate (less than 10 cc/sec).

3. Recurrent urinary tract infections secondary to obstruction.

4. Stricture disease requiring periodic dilatation every 2 to 3 months 10%

Obstructive symptomatology with or without stricture disease requiring dilatation 1 to 2 times per year 0%

Urninary tract infection: 0%

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Alex

I have incontinence of not being able to control my urine and have to use the incontinence pads about 5 a day and Its non-ratable, no prostate cancer but a swollen prostate and can't get it SC....> I'm SOL here!

Rick H has a good argument and he should be rated for loss of organ and ED. from post surgery Its great the cancer is gone but

he should be able to keep his residuals secondary disability claims.

jmo

.............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use