Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Injury Not Documented In Smr

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

How important is it to actually have documentation of a specific incident in your SMR in order to get SC granted.

I was wondering because once I get done with all this lung cancer stuff (which will probably take forever) I want to start on some of the other things I found in my husband's file.

He claimed SC for right shoulder problems - which he said occured when playing softball on team for the Air Force.

The exam DID show problems with his right shoulder.

However, they said SC was denied because his service medical records did not note any specific complaint of problems with his right shoulder.

BUT he filed the claim PRIOR to his retirement.

He entered the Air Force in 1970 with NO shoulder problems.

He filed his claim for Compensation in 1997 - (while he was STILL IN the service) indicating that he was having trouble with his right shoulder.

He retired in 1998.

So can a case be made that the shoulder disorder (which was medically supported) that was NOT in existence when he entered the military in 1970 was more likely than not INCURRED DURING service - if it was reported PRIOR to his retirement (even if there is no specific incident documented in his medical recorded that would show EXACTLY when it first occured?)

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The service assumes you are perfectly healthy when you enter unless there is some evidence to the contrary. I think you could get this SC'ed since it is in his records. It is when nothing is in the records that it is very hard. If your husband had waited five years after he retired to go to a doctor about his shoulder then he would have no chance if it was not in the SMR's. I got screwed on a TMJ claim because the dentist did not write down a diagnosis when he examined me. He did it on purpose I am sure since I was on a levy for Vietnam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to both of you. I was thinking the same thing - but not sure. I thought if he claimed it prior to discharge it should be obvious that it bothered him before he left the service. We haven't been able to get a copy of his discharge physical. Tried in June and was told by the records center that the VA has his records. Requested from VA August 10 -- but just gettting delay letters from them so far.

But I still thought that making the claim PRIOR to the discharge should kind of set a date for it as during service..especially with 28 years in. And they did confirm the injury -- just said that it was not documented in the SMRs.

I keep wondering if I should wait to send the CUES in though.

We have the shoulder injury.

We also have cervical strain - which he also claimed upon his discharge. Was documented in his SMR - but the VA could find no current injury -- except for Some slight something or the other at a certain location on his cervical spine.

But later - when they did the exam for Gulf War illnes -- they denied service connection for his headaches because they said they were caused by his cervical disorder which was at the ExACTSAME location that they found the exact same insignificant whatever when he tried to CLAIM cervical strain.

I think they should award this back to the date they actually found something that confirmed the chronicity of the injury at the cervical region that was documented in the SMRS.

He also claimed for dental TREATMENT -- but was denied - though the regs clearly state that Gulf War vets who did not recieve dental treatment within six months of discharge are allowed one time dental treatment for each tooth / condition.

I think we have possible CUES on all of these (plus maybe more) but I am concerned that if we file it now before the lung cancer claim goes all the way through.... that will slow down the claim for the 100 percent for the lung cancer -- and i don't want to do that.

Free

Sounds like a Possible Cue to me.
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free Spirit

I think I would go for the lung cancer and wait til you get that service connected. Lung cancer is very serious and is the kind of claim that puts everything else aside. The VA will hold up your lung cancer claim if there are lots of other claims in the works, and they will get them mixed up. Get the 100% and worry about the others later. No time limits for the CUE's. Your spouse deserves SC as soon as possible for the lung cancer, and so do you for DIC. You want that ten year clock to start ticking once he gets 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Since claims can take so long I didn't know which would be the best approach.

Free

Free Spirit

I think I would go for the lung cancer and wait til you get that service connected. Lung cancer is very serious and is the kind of claim that puts everything else aside. The VA will hold up your lung cancer claim if there are lots of other claims in the works, and they will get them mixed up. Get the 100% and worry about the others later. No time limits for the CUE's. Your spouse deserves SC as soon as possible for the lung cancer, and so do you for DIC. You want that ten year clock to start ticking once he gets 100%.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use