Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Complicated "Intent To File" Question - I am still within 1 year of separation

Rate this question


jag32

Question

I separated from the USMC on September 2nd, 2014, so I am still within 1 year of my separation.  I am about 2 weeks away until I go beyond my year of separation.  I have not filed my disability yet, but yesterday I went and filed the "Intent to File" giving me an intent to file date of August 15, 2015.  Does this intent to file date of August 15, 2015 INCLUDE my almost entire year ive already had since I separated since I filed the intent to file within 1 year of my separation?  

If I file my FDC before September 2nd, 2015, I know I will get back pay to my separation of September 2nd, 2014... but my question is, since I filed an intent to file with a date of August 15, 2015 and my separation date was September 2, 2014... if I file my claim in lets say, November 2015, will I get back pay back to my separation of September 2, 2014 because I filed my intent to file within 1 year of my separation?

I am very confused and any advice would be helpful.  There is no way I can pull together my entire FDC and get it submitted by my 1 year from separation date in a few weeks, but because I filed the intent to file within 1 year, am I protected for back pay all the way back to my separation date because of my intent to file within 1 year??

 

Thanks  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

That would make sense but nothing with VA makes sense.  Keep in mind that filing a FDC is faster but you do not have to file a FDC.  You can file a regular claim and VA will ask you for more medical evidence once they begin to process your claim.  If you file a FDC and you do not have all the evidence then VA will deny your claim but if you file a regular claim VA is suppose to assist you gather the evidence you need to get your claim granted.  By filing a regular claim you will have more time in gathering the evidence you need.  Never trust VA, make sure you do your research/homework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Pete,

Thanks.  What i'm concerned with is I don't want to lose the year of back pay.  If I REALLY need to and I will lose that year of back pay, I can go 24/7 to get this done and submitted on time but it will be a stretch.  Any regulation or anything you know of that says if I submit an "intent to file" when i'm still in my 1 year of separation window, it extends the window even further?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

By filing the intent to file within the one year you should be good as far as being paid from the time you got out of service. If I were you I would make sure to list the conditions you plan to file for on your intent to file. That way those conditions will still hopefully be easily service connected because you stated those issues before the one year mark. As long as you have all if your medical records there is probably no reason you can't be ready to file an FDC. It will take longer if you have to wait for VA to request those medical records, especially if there are any from private doctors. If you have them, send them with your FDC. Get everything together now. The hardest part is getting started. Decide your approach and move forward. You will be surprised at how things flow. Take it step by step and ask questions as you go. Just make sure you ask questions with each step to stay on track. More Hadit members will chime in. This is only my opinion. Hope it helps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I wouldn't stress out about the FDC part, I would get the file submitted before the 1 year mark though.  File everything that you have that can link to military medical records.  File on whatever secondary conditions they caused, if you need to get IMO/IME's later, you still can protect the dates.

 

For effective dates, it is the later date from the of intent to file, or the actual date of entitlement, but there is "an exception in cases where the claim is filed within one year of separation from active military service. For these claims, the effective date will be the day following separation"...

If they give you 0%, that's ok, you can appeal it or refile if the condition gets worse later down the road.  The idea is don't wait to get it on the books, its much harder later than it is now.

 

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

File all your claims via Certified Mail/Return Receipt before the end of the month.  Why have you waited so long to file?  If you file within one year of discharge there are many chronic disabilities that will be considered as service connected without having to prove the nexus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use