Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Choice Program

Rate this question


RUREADY

Question

I had to go to the Director office about my consult for acupuncture. The consult was sitting

on nobody desk, but in the end I got approve.

Just wondering is anybody heard every vet will gets Choice program starting Nov 1. I seen the memo but just

not sure it said everyone or not. That's what I was told anybody?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

update on this bill it has been pass by the House and Senate and enacted

by being sign by the President July 31 2015 GREAT NEWS

If you would like to see the votes this is a great sight.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr3236. I guess the guy in Director office wasn't

lying after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe that the implementation of the "choice program" was(and is) so poor that it's not really able to meet the promises and goals. And if VA's past record is any guide, never will be in our lifetimes.

The problem is not the program its the people who don't have a CLUE of how it is suppose to work

I was told they are having classes training people right now for the program. The Doctor have fill out

4-5  consults for me but its always the wrong form or goes to someone where it sits on his desk not knowing

what thee hell to do. If this pass you got to any Doctor you want. You can complain on her about this an that

but if you don't tell the right person like complain to CHOICE, Director, Bob, Hickley, even the PRESIDENT

tell somebody about it what you think that can help you cant change the a system overnight without problems

I do this all the time because if they don't know the problems they sure cant fix them. Nothing wrong with complaining

just make your complain known to VBA. RU

 

People and training are a part of the implementation.  It's hard to have "dumbed down" training make much of an impact.

Then, add on the VA's lethargic approach to change at administrative working levels.

Remember, if there are ANY discontinuities in the admin scheme, things just grind to a halt. Unfortunately, this is quite common within government

bureaucratic entities.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Chuck75, you dont want Choice or what are you saying. Do you go to Atlanta VA

and if so I know you got problems, but this is the best thing for us it cant be no worst.

Congress finally trying to do something for the VETS is good news. Admin scheme I cant control

who steals and who not, just give me some. lol  Lethargic approach, this went through congress

very quickly thanks to MR Trump comments. But how long it will take for them to work out all the problems

I don't know but its a good start and the bill explains it self if read.  Nov 1 is not that far away so we will see

As far is the government goes I guess all us are the Blame for this mishap because we voted them in. Look

at who voted yea or nay and change your vote best I know. RU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

"Chuck75, you don't want Choice or what are you saying"?

Au contraire!  I want a choice program that meets veteran's needs, not buried in VA "red tape" and boondoggles.

I started trying to use choice last year. The VAMC eventually used fee paid instead, likely because they didn't have

the specialty that I needed, and had not figured out how to even use Choice at that time. That took months. The only reason I tried it was that

my doctor told me that the practice did fee paid in the past, and, using private insurance would likely have cost me about 2k in co-pay and out of pocket.

The last time I looked, the CBOC was running over 31 days, so I was placed on the "Choice program" list earlier this year,

as authorized only for PCP care. Naturally, this is not the care I usually need, other than for routine VA prescription renewal, etc.

That part of the program was still screwed up the last time I inquired.  Further, even though the VMAC has the records from the fee paid

treatment, they are not accessible by the VA  CBOC PCP. ???? Something about different data bases was the last excuse given.

If that isn't bad enough, I've lived in the area for more than two decades, and have never heard of most of the doctors on the choice list that are even close to local.

It's also of some note that most of my medical care is directly related to SC'd conditions, and they occasionally require "prompt' but not usually emergency care.

Choice seems to be ever changing at this point, so it's a real hit or miss deal in my experience.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Everyone started with fee base than after about two months of treatment than it is

suppose to change to Choice. Changing is where my problem started. I was told

you could find your own doctor or use some what VA has use before, so I went and

find my own. I don't know why your PC cant see your records they are suppose to see the

treatment you are receiving.

Not sure about sc or not but it probably will be for SC disabilities or a co-pay for a

non SC. I suppose to be ready to use Choice by Wednesday but I heard this 2 months ago.

I really believe the people  doing the paper work cant read because I had an argument with the supervisor

telling me I was approve for services. I goes to the doctor for treatment the doc says the letter says

I'm not approve so I read the consult sure enough it says not approve. It took fee base two-three days

to admit this even the supervisor couldn't read it that's been since June so I'm  still waiting but I got some fire

up their a** so maybe Wednesday. It should get better sooner than later.RU

 

Edited by RUREADY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The HCV (hep C) issue is a boiling pot.  The US Military used Air Injection Guns to immunize millions of people through basic training up to the mid 90's.  These guns were capable of spreading HCV.  They have awarded disabilities due to this issue.  That, combined with the fact that a much higher percentage of ex military have HCV, is an indication that many more should probably be awarded benefits because of it.  People can live their whole lives with HCV and never know that they have it until it turns into a fatal condition, like cirrhosis or any one of a number of cancers.

 

Thing is, nobody is out there beating the bush, running the numbers, figuring out how many of us went to the same training, got the same shots from the same guns, tracking us down and checking us for HCV.  They have this ability at their fingertips, they probably already have a good idea about what it can cost, and they don't want to go public with this because its huge.  People die from HCV, figuring how many are already dead, and linking those deaths to the possibility that HCV was involved, would open a hornets nets of litigation just from the estates of those who are already gone. 

 

This is about Diabetes I and II, non Hodgkin's lymphoma, fatty liver disease and cirrhosis, and a host of other condition that are related to HCV.  The end result of telling the public all about it would cost billions.  The end result of not telling the public all about is immoral, unethical, and leaves thousands/tens of thousands and possibly millions of people ignorant and at risk for all the problems that result from untreated HCV.  This include the husbands/wives and children and grandchildren of the affected members.

 

Balance the topic out, and I see why they want to divert so much to treating those with HCV, its a back door to a solution that is nothing more than a half step to evade telling the truth to the public at large.  The Choice Card funds can be used to help hide the truth from America.

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use