Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The More I Read, the Angrier I Become

Rate this question


Sgt. Wilky

Question

I've been slowly reading through my BVA decision that I received last Friday; and I have been making notes and comparing with the referenced 38CFR notes from the judges. The more I read of their decisions and grants and comparing it with the Denver RO denial after denial ad nauseum, the angrier I get. I'm now getting a more clear idea of the scope of how bad the RO had screwed me over and the utter lack of competence from the C&P exams through the decision making process that seems to be the norm at VBA. There is no other way to describe either the lack of training and understanding of the system or the outright deceit of the this agency as nothing but criminal. There is no other way of describing what happened to me and obviously happens to so many other veterans out there, except as criminal. The abuse that I've uncovered-just in 27 pages of my decision-outlines just how out of touch the VA is, and how much despair this system is in.

In my very ill-informed opinion, the judges have done a real good job at explaining their decisions; even though I may not agree with a few. The grants I did receive, were very clearly referenced and their application and reasoning are well thought out. I went from a 30% D.V. to a 60%-70% veteran and I am owed literally almost a $100k in back pay. Lord have Mercy! When can I expect that? I'm literally sick to my stomach with the stress of receiving that kind of pay.

Semper Fi!

Wilky

Edited by Sgt. Wilky
Thanks VYNC!

BOHICA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

problem is, the RO says that 12% of its claims reach BVA

 

most Vets take a no, and go away

 

go figure, as complex as the VARO makes claims, its no wonder that they don't want face to face contact at the VHA where the vets can show them facts

They should make VBA representatives a part of the VHA system.  One in every PACT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

problem is, the RO says that 12% of its claims reach BVA

 

most Vets take a no, and go away

 

go figure, as complex as the VARO makes claims, its no wonder that they don't want face to face contact at the VHA where the vets can show them facts

They should make VBA representatives a part of the VHA system.  One in every PACT.

"They should make VBA representatives a part of the VHA system.  One in every PACT."

Too often, just adding another level in the process is the VA's answer, as well as that for many of the other bureaucratic entities in and outside of the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Not just add to it, but cut it out at the VARO level.  Force them to come to the vet and help fully document the claims (as a non adversarial agent working for the vet) before the claim is sent to the final review.  This would encircle the gathering evidence and prep for decision phase.  They could also council vets if there is no reasonable grounds or basis for a claim to succeed on.

Face it, a huge number of appeals are based on problems and errors that could and should be resolved at the lowest level of the process.  75% is a lot, and by doing this, they could cut that number dramatically.

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

When we were in the military, if we screwed to this degree we would end up spending our day doing push ups, scrubbing garbage cans, picking up trash, or they take a chunk out of our paychecks. Perhaps it is time to start implementing this type of punishment for irresponsible VA staff. The BVA needs to inform the RO of what is being missed and take steps to change it. When the VA screws up like this, the very least they could do is include a formal letter of apology instead of the usual stoic award letter.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Congrats on the good news, and sounds like you guys have a good plan

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When we were in the military, if we screwed to this degree we would end up spending our day doing push ups, scrubbing garbage cans, picking up trash, or they take a chunk out of our paychecks. Perhaps it is time to start implementing this type of punishment for irresponsible VA staff. The BVA needs to inform the RO of what is being missed and take steps to change it. When the VA screws up like this, the very least they could do is include a formal letter of apology instead of the usual stoic award letter.

We got Article 15's too.  Legal way to screw with your money and time.  There really should be a means to punish incompetence in the VHA and VBA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use