Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

C&P

Rate this question


Dtown

Question

I'm a little confused, I had a C&P done for both knees and ankles.  I could see the computer over the Dr's shoulder and everything looked favorable; flare-ups, pain, discomfort, loss of motion.  

I got confused when the Dr. got to the question; is patient being examined during a flare-up? He stated yes for all four joins. 

I told him I was in discomfort, but that I didn't have any flare-ups.  He stuck with "I was having a flare-up".  Is this going to hurt or help my exam results?

 

thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

could hurt you since a "flare up" is considered to be how your disability (at this point claimed disability) is at its worst point.

I told him I was in discomfort, but that I didn't have any flare-ups.  He stuck with "I was having a flare-up".  Is this going to hurt or help my exam results?

I guess the question is what did he ask you specifically and what did you say specifically..

Did he ask if you have flare ups and were you having one now

and

Did you say you DONT have flare up at all, or that you were not having one at the moment.

 

If you said you dont relaly have flare up just discomfort. he may have just put down flare up since you discomfort was as falred up as it got and the closest thing being to "peak" in your pain and discomfort.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I did state that I get several flare-ups, but when he got the the question below he didn't ask, he marked yes. 

Im not sure if it's going to hurt the results of my exam (range of motion part) or help my cause in regards to the flare-ups. 

 

Is the exam being conducted during a flare-up? [x] Yes [ ]No

 

He then skipped the following;

If no, does the Veteran report flare-ups? [ ]Yes [ ] No
Frequency: daily
Severity: moderate
Duration: depends on activity
If the examination is not being conducted during a flare-up:
[ ] The examination supports the Veteran's statements describing
functional loss during flare-ups.
[ ] The examination contradicts the Veteran's statements
describing
functional loss during flare-ups. Please explain.
[ ]The examination neither supports nor contradicts the Veteran's
statements describing functional loss during flare-ups.
Does pain, weakness, fatigability or incoordination significantly limit
functional ability with flare-ups?
[ ] Yes [ ] No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well, it could go either way, 50/50, since he skipped the part about frequency and duration.  Strangly enough, most of the rating amounts are based on ROM(range of motion) and not pain.  At the bare minimum, having flare-ups shows that while you have a general level of pain and discomfort, you also experience episodes of increased pain and discomfort.  During which your ROM may be more limited than normal.

You will have to wait and see what is written in your exam notes.

Best of luck to you.

Semper Fi.

Andyman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you! 

Crossing my fingers.  I am SC 0% for L ankle and filed for an increase.  I feel the C&P was in my favor; 

ROM- Abnormal or outside of normal range.  Dorsiflexion: 0-10 degrees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Dtown,

Just for curiosity's sake I wanted to let you know, I was originally SC for L ankle @ 10% at my EAS. And nearly 2 years later SC for bilateral patellafemoral pain syndrom(knee pain) also @ 10%.  15 years later L ankle unchanged, knees are now each 10% plus the bilateral pain syndrom.  But I just had C&P for R ankle secondary to L ankle, and I saw on the exam notes examiner wrote at least as likely due to L ankle.

I hope you get yours bumped up!

Semper Fi.

Andyman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use