Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

So What It Next?

willyd

Asked by willyd,

 Share

Question

willyd Apprentice

willyd

Posted
Posted

Any ideas as to where the Project 112/SHAD goes from here?  The fact that the National Academies reviewed and updated its own findings is quite interesting.  I believe their website says that are 85% funded by taxpayers dollars.   There were several veterans in the meetings - any ideas as to their opinions as to where we should go in the future?  Thanks for your service.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Popular Posts

willyd
willyd

Any ideas as to where the Project 112/SHAD goes from here?  The fact that the National Academies reviewed and updated its own findings is quite interesting.  I believe their website says that are 85%

Jerrel
Jerrel

The SHAD study was a wast of 5 more years and once again incorrect I think that Congress is the only one that help us now however in the past not even Congress could get the info needed to g

Capt.Contaminate
Capt.Contaminate

Exactly correct Jerrel. The 3500 test involved in Project 112/Shad , have only resulted in roughly 20 of those test being declassified and brought forth by President George Bush in 2005 of which Jerre

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Jerrel Proficient

Jerrel

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

The SHAD study was a wast of 5 more years and once again incorrect I think that Congress

is the only one that help us now however in the past not even Congress could get the info

needed to get all the facts out but we must keep working at it, the info must be released by the DOD.

Elk Hunt Test #65_14_Gerstle River Test Site_Landbase Test_Ft. Greely AK. 1964_S.R.#99_06

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything

the American public believes is false."-- William Casey, CIA Director!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Capt.Contaminate Apprentice

Capt.Contaminate

Posted
Posted

Exactly correct Jerrel. The 3500 test involved in Project 112/Shad , have only resulted in roughly 20 of those test being declassified and brought forth by President George Bush in 2005 of which Jerrel was one of those participants. So why not release them all??? And only the early test were released??? Those in 1964 and 65 mostly. What about the test from 1968-1975??? The same year that Agent Orange was outlawed was also the end of Project 112/Shad.  Now is that just a coinincidence???  I think not.

If we as remnants from that era and especially from Fort Tumorville.....I mean Fort Greely continue to press it still is very tough because of the amount of money these laughable studies cost and  come forth and squash any voice of reason from any one that trys to respond against its findings. And the amount of time that goes by will only bring out the truth of Project 112/Shad and Fort Greely ........like in 2050 when everyone who could qualify for a benefit thru VA will be long gone. Sadly nothing has changed but we all have hope that TRUTH will be unveiled ........but when??? NEVER GIVE UP.......C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      RICHKAY
      RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Great Content
      pacmanx1
      pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • First Post
      czqiang1079
      czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Vicdamon12
      Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Panther8151
      Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in What is the DIC timeline?

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept