Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Starting a new claim

Rate this question


Machete

Question

Hi everyone, first off thank you for having such a great site. I'm new here and I've been reading around on here and just wanted to know that I'm on the right track. I already have a 60% rating, 50% for sleep apnea and 10% for tinnitus. I was awarded this rating in 2009 right after I got out. I was an infantry squad leader with the 101st and I deployed to Iraq twice, Kosovo and Bosnia. After I got out I started struggling with what I now know is ptsd. Last month after years of fighting with my wife about getting help I went to the VA and asked to see someone to get help. I went in for my appointment with a psychiatrist and he diagnosed me with ptsd and gave me meds, he also pointed me to a local vet center to see a psychologist. I've been going weekly for one on one counseling and taking my meds. I never went in with the intention of filling a claim, just to get help. But at the vet center they have helped me acknowledged that I have issues and I need real help. They are going to have me sit down with a vet rep to help me file a ptsd claim, I haven't worked in awhile because of my issues and really need the financial help. The vet center says that because of all my combat time, my CIB, and the problems the doctor and the vet center see I have, I shouldn't have much problems with my claim. Is there anything I should be doing to be proactive. They said they want to wait until May to file the claim to have more documentation. Thanks guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Why are you only rated 60%??

The 50% 60% &10% you have should be rated at 80%  that is a 82%rating by the VA 82% is rounded to the 80% rate.

OR if your 60% for the 50%S.A. AND 10% Tinnitus? which is rated 55% and rounded off to the 60% rating

you will need a higher rating to get to the 100%   actually you will need at least a 100% PTSD Rating.

b/c a 60% rating and a 70%PTSD Rating will be a 90%combined rating as that is rounded off at 88%    hence rounded off at the 90% combined rating, they only rate PTSD IN 10% 30% 50% 70% Or the Full 100%

jmo

............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You should file a ITF  PTSD Claim  First & then gather up your evidence medical evidence is what you will need, since you have your CIB then you don't need to prove your stressor's as they are waived for combat duty,  you need to get your PTSD Diagnose from the VA Which you have,  you still need a nexus to link the PTSD to your prior military service as the cause of your PTSD   It's obvious that you have it but that's the VA for ya  and that's what they want .

I would do all this myself and not rely on the VSO.

jmo

..................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

thanks for the reply Buck. yea i have 60% total, 50% for the SA and 10% for tinnitus oh and 10% for degenerative back condition. but yea your right even with a 70% I'll still come up short of a 100%. I'll get on that nexus and keep you all informed of where i'm at, thanks for the help brother. ohh i looked up my original claim from 2009 and i used the VFW to help file my claim, are all these vet organizations about the same or is there one better at helping than others? I remember I used the VFW rep at my former duty station and they were helpful, just wondering bro. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I thought the whole point of some of the 'fast tracks' utilized were based on the CIB being enough for the VA to take the veteran's word on events leading up to a possible PTSD diagnosis?  Is a Nexus even required?  Isn't it Presumptive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree with you Talon II---

The CIB should certainly cause the VA to concede the stressor.

Regardless of whatever war period, the CIB denotes the ' fear of and close proximity to' hostile activity that the 2010 PTSD regs cover.

I don't know why a vet rep wants to wait until May to file this.... then again they do need to have a copy of your DD 214, and maybe other paper work, too.

 We did have a situation here about a year ago...wife stated her husband had CIB on his DD 214 but either VA would not diagnose PTSD....

or said he had to prove his stressor and had denied the claim .... that didn't make sense but I don't think the wife ever came back here.....

A CIB is proof of the nexus to inservice traumatic events that caused the PTSD.

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck52 is right, Do a Intent to File(ITF) now so Your back pay will be Started. This can give you thousands of more dollars depending how long it will be until you submit your claim. It will take less than 5 minutes of your time on ebenefits. Good luck and thank you for your service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use