Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Denied

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

The crazy one here, I will not go into any personal rant about how screwed up VA is. I will just say that VA will deny any and all claims they choose regardless of the evidence until the veteran appeal their (VA) decision.  It is always best to file a NOD than to file a CUE claim but if you have the evidence and you have gone beyond the time of filing a NOD then definitely file a CUE claim and get a qualified attorney.  IMHO (IN MY HUMBLE OPINION) a veteran is a better advocate than a VSO but a veteran does need some assistance with getting through VAs' red tape if s/he is not familiar with it. Keep in mind that VA make decisions because they are in the position and have the power to do so. Getting angry/Yelling at them/Cursing them or even Correcting them can cause retaliations that could cause problems in the veterans claims. VA can be very vindictive and it is the veterans livelihood that suffers.  Just passing the word on. Never Give Up.

P.S. We have not mentioned it in a while but there are VSOs and VA personnel lurking around these boards and with any good thing there is always bad things in there mitts.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

And no, I can never just stop with a simple sentence or two, or three, ...

Sorry.

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I am not sure if you would call  it the Three Card Monte or the Shell Game but the current backlog has gone down but who is watching the current appeals pending? Are they even considered in any current report or are they just lost in the wind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I don't disagree with anything you said but it isn't only the raters that do a pp job, I think you have to include some of the C&P examiners  I just had a C&P exam for fractured foot, deviated septum and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy secondary to LOWER BACK.  I couldn't believe what the doctor wrote in the DBQ.  I'm not including the entire DBQ but enough to show the total incompetence of the doctor.  I just went back to a civilian pain clinic this morning for a second epidural.  The doctor talked with me and said he was going to do the injection in a specific nerve going to my LEFT leg and foot.  When they did the x-ray to show him where to put the injection the conversation between the doctor and xray technician went something like this:  Doc "what is that?" technician - "what is it?, I've never seen anything like that."  After four attempts at the injection the doctor told me he couldn't do it because there was no space for the needle.  He had to get another packet of syringes and do the injection in the spine.  He showed me the x-ray after he finished and explained why he couldn't do the initial injection.  He said "at least now I know why you are in pain."

I sent copies of the doctors notes (sciatica), MRI results showing multiple nerve impingement, and the examination results from my first visit to the pain clinic with my claim but the VA doctor says it is due to a fractured foot.  The date of diagnosis of the peripheral neuropathy below is the date I fractured my foot. :tongue: 

1. Diagnosis
------------
Does the Veteran have a peripheral nerve condition or peripheral neuropathy?
[X] Yes [ ] No
Diagnosis #1: Peripheral neuropathy
ICD code: 302226006
Date of diagnosis: 11/16/1999

3. Symptoms
-----------
a. Does the Veteran have any symptoms attributable to any peripheral nerve
conditions?
[X] Yes [ ] No
Paresthesias and/or dysesthesias
Right lower extremity: [ ] None [X] Mild [ ] Moderate [ ] Severe

11. Nerves Affected: Severity evaluation for lower extremity nerves
-------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Sciatic nerve
No response provided.
b. External popliteal (common peroneal) nerve
Right: [ ] Normal [X] Incomplete paralysis [ ] Complete paralysis
If Incomplete paralysis is checked, indicate severity:
[X] Mild [ ] Moderate [ ] Severe

17. Remarks, if any:
--------------------
VBMS reviewed.
Medical opinion: veteran peripheral neuropathy CONDITION is at mild
severity and is least as likely as not due to injury incurred in from
Jones fracture in service as evidenced by numerous STR for same
complaints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
42 minutes ago, gs106 said:

I don't disagree with anything you said but it isn't only the raters that do a pp job, I think you have to include some of the C&P examiners  

 

Yes, this condition is systemic, keep in mind that C & P examiners must go by certain C & P index examinations given by the VARO which may or may not be complete and the C & P examiner may not be experienced or competent to complete a proper C & P exam. Of course the examiner may also not be veteran friendly. It seems that there are more denials than grants coming from VA lately.

Edited by pete992
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 6/2/2016 at 2:34 PM, OldJoe said:

And no, I can never just stop with a simple sentence or two, or three, ...

Sorry.

Oh, but you did just that, here! Lol!

You are so right, when I was going through my initial claims process, in mid '98, while still on AD, I had no idea I was about to get the shaft. I fell down stairs on my 5th day of Boot Camp, November 1992. Landed knees first, then chest, legs rebounded behind me, compressing my lower back.

My knees are one of the most noted physical issue in my SMR, all 6 years of it, and yet it took till August 2000 to get granted only 10%. Two years, of which 6 months were still AD time. The other contentions were granted by May of '99, and back dated to 11/98. I went to the VAMC well over a dozen times for my knees alone! The problem??? The way past retirement doc who was treating me finally retired.  New Dr. sent me to the big VAMC in Philly, got it all squared away. I was so grateful at that time, that I just let it all ride. 

I know now, that I should have filed for EED to my EAS, and so on and so forth. Same with my MDD and SA.

But I'm here now, better late than never.

Semper Fi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Andyman73, it sounds like things are finally working out.  Hope I am just as successful.

I know it will take time and I have to be patient.

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use