Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question For Jstacy & Berta

Rate this question


david walker

Question

In my last C&P the doc stated cervical radiculopathy of bilateral upper extremities, he did not address anything about my shoulder and said the arthritis in my wrist was mild. My question is: can the VA take away the 10% I was awarded for my shoulder (due to trauma) and/or the 10% I was awarded for my wrist (arthitis due to trauma) earlier? I'm worried they will claim these 2 are the same as the cervical radiculopathy.

I'm really worried they may lower my percentage. I guess this is due to not feeling like I've gotten a fair shake the other times. Guys I'm tired, I feel like thats what they are hoping for (I'll give up). Its hard having to take a had full of pills just to get to work and a hand full to stay. Thanks for listen & all your advice, it gets really hard this time of year. Theres so much to do & I'm having to stay medicated just to get through it.

I'm really aggravated with the VA. Seems to me the C&P docs purpose is to disprove what you civilian & VA doctors say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Seems to me the C&P docs purpose is to disprove what you civilian & VA doctors say."

Yes -I agree- this is so often the case-

Do your service connected disabiliies "aggravate" the cervical radiculopathy ? If so you can make claim as secondary under the regs in 38 CFR as well as direct SC claim.

I cannot imagine that upper extremity bilateral cervical radiculopathy would not be medically related to or aggravated by the two SC conditions. Then again I am no doctor-

But your claim makes sense to me-

Do the meds you take affect your ability to work?

Even though you are employed -this is still a factor in your overall disabling conditions-

The VA cannot lower or take away comp without clear and convincing medical evidence of substantial improvement.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree with Berta.

The Cervical Radiculpathy should be considerd in both arms. Mine is left side only and It is 20 percent. Yours should be bilattarel.

Edited by jstacy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

If the C&P doc didn't address the shoulder the VA doesn't want the doc to look at it. My guess is that you put in a claim concerning pain radiating down both arms. The shoulder and wrist should stay the same. You also should get a % for the cervical radiculopothy. Do you have a % for your cervical spine? If so you probably won't get an increase for that if you get the radiculopothy %. Va does try to wear you down. They proposed to reduce my % from 50-30 but couldn't do it on the C&P doc's exam alone. since my C&P I submiitted new evidence and they decided to leave the % alone. The day after I got my SOC from them I filed another claim for Sciatica in the left leg and an increase on my lumbar spine. Hope all turns out well with your claim. Don't despair and give up. Dale Jr. 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the main nerves effected by cervical radiculopathy. What did the exam say as per sensory defect.

The median nerve

8515 Paralysis of:

Complete; the hand inclined to the ulnar side, the 70 60

index and middle fingers more extended than

normally, considerable atrophy of the muscles of

the thenar eminence, the thumb in the plane of the

hand (ape hand); pronation incomplete and

defective, absence of flexion of index finger and

feeble flexion of middle finger, cannot make a

fist, index and middle fingers remain extended;

cannot flex distal phalanx of thumb, defective

opposition and abduction of the thumb, at right

angles to palm; flexion of wrist weakened; pain

with trophic disturbances..........................

Incomplete:

Severe............................................ 50 40

Moderate.......................................... 30 20

Mild.............................................. 10 10

8615 Neuritis.

8715 Neuralgia.

The ulnar nerve

8516 Paralysis of:

Complete; the ``griffin claw'' deformity, due to 60 50

flexor contraction of ring and little fingers,

atrophy very marked in dorsal interspace and thenar

and hypothenar eminences; loss of extension of ring

and little fingers cannot spread the fingers (or

reverse), cannot adduct the thumb; flexion of wrist

weakened...........................................

Incomplete:

Severe............................................ 40 30

Moderate.......................................... 30 20

Mild.............................................. 10 10

8616 Neuritis.

8716 Neuralgia.

Musculocutaneous nerve

8517 Paralysis of:

Complete; weakness but not loss of flexion of elbow 30 20

and supination of forearm..........................

Incomplete:

Severe............................................ 20 20

Moderate.......................................... 10 10

Mild.............................................. 0 0

8617 Neuritis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

I remember you've held steady and fast, come a long way in this fight.

I know you will not give up and let them prevail, you hang in there buddy,

down the road it will be worth your tenacity.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use