Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Uterine Fibroids/Hysterectomy Post Service

Rate this question


vee330

Question

Medically discharged in Jan/2002.  Received 0% for uterine fibroids but granted service connnected.  One year later (2003) had to have a total abdominal hysterectomy and was not aware that I could receive compensation for.  I applied for compensation Dec 2016.  What is the possibility of being granted service connnection secondary to uterine fibroids for the hysterectomy?  In addition, the possibility of back pay for the hysterectomy?

 

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

K. Turner Hi  K., welcome to Hadit. OK your two questions. First, to get a disability from the VA you need 1) a current diagnosis, 2) an event or injury in-service, and 3) a medical opinion that they are connected Ex. your ankle injury/surgery is the cause of your current foot arthritis. If you had a diagnosis that your hysterectomy  was caused in the service, you need a doctor to provide that analysis and rationale, called a nexus. Your own doctor can do that, but it is advisable to read up on what is needed for a successful IMO or nexus. The doc provides his reasoning, based on a technical basis and lists his or her professional accomplishments, kinda like a biography includes his professional degrees, any published articles, etc. As for your second question, it may be connected to the Korean territory as it relates to Agent Orange. Many diseases are considered presumptive to A.O., but there are strict limitations regulating that condition  See https://www.hillandponton.com/va-presumptives-korean-veterans/      If this doesn't fit your situation, then I'm not aware of any other special considerations for Korean veterans. So it would default to the 3 elements explained above. As an aside, if the veteran was a Marine and was stationed at Camp Lejeune, there are presumptives for cancers if they meet the requirements of time frame and duration. See https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/camp-lejeune-water-contamination/  I can anticipate you have more questions based on your specific details. Ask away if you do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
51 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

K. Turner Hi  K., welcome to Hadit. OK your two questions. First, to get a disability from the VA you need 1) a current diagnosis, 2) an event or injury in-service, and 3) a medical opinion that they are connected Ex. your ankle injury/surgery is the cause of your current foot arthritis. If you had a diagnosis that your hysterectomy  was caused in the service, you need a doctor to provide that analysis and rationale, called a nexus. Your own doctor can do that, but it is advisable to read up on what is needed for a successful IMO or nexus. The doc provides his reasoning, based on a technical basis and lists his or her professional accomplishments, kinda like a biography includes his professional degrees, any published articles, etc. As for your second question, it may be connected to the Korean territory as it relates to Agent Orange. Many diseases are considered presumptive to A.O., but there are strict limitations regulating that condition  See https://www.hillandponton.com/va-presumptives-korean-veterans/      If this doesn't fit your situation, then I'm not aware of any other special considerations for Korean veterans. So it would default to the 3 elements explained above. As an aside, if the veteran was a Marine and was stationed at Camp Lejeune, there are presumptives for cancers if they meet the requirements of time frame and duration. See https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/camp-lejeune-water-contamination/  I can anticipate you have more questions based on your specific details. Ask away if you do. 

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use