Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Thoughts about OSA Claim

Rate this question


Cessnabc

Question

I am SC for Chronic Sinusitis, Allergic Rhinitis with Nasal Polyps Benign, Mild Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

 

My ENT surgeon (Navy Capt, retired; (Septoplasty)) wrote in his operation report - preoperative diagnosis was (1.) Obstructive Sleep Apnea and (2.) Deviated Nasal Septum; Postoperative Diagnosis was the same. 

The original claim was denied and the VA stated that “service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition” (Sleep Disturbance (Sleep Apnea)) and that “there was no actual diagnosis of sleep apnea in service, only snoring was the outcome of the study”.  They did not find a link between my medical condition and military service.

I filed a NOD with the highlighting the following points.  (All of this information was submitted with the original claim)

I had a sleep study done in Sept 2007 which showed 2 Obstructive Apneas, two hypopneas, loud snoring, and a total AHI of 0.5 events per hour with 1.6 events per hour in REM.  Oxygen saturation nadir was 89%.  (Polysomnogram report states under history: "referred for he evaluation of SNORING, EDS.  The current Epworth Sleepiness Scale was 14."

According to the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, (Vol. 5, Nos. 2009) "OSA is defined by occurrence of daytime sleepiness, loud snoring, witnessed breathing interruptions, or awakenings due to gasping or choking in the present of a least 5 obstructive respiratory events per hour of sleep. 

I had another sleep study done in 2014 that showed an apnea-hypopnea index of 19 events per hour with oxygen desaturation nadir of 83%.  CPAP was prescribed at that time for mild to moderate OSA.

 

 

I contacted my surgeon and he wrote a NEXUS letter that stated "it is my opinion that it is more likely than not that the veteran's current condition of OSA represents a progression of disease that occurred while he was on active military service". 

 

The VA denied it.  I appealed it to the Board of Veteran's Appeals.

 

After I filed the Form 9, I also received another NEXUS letter. (I had requested previously but did not receive it, so I filed without the second letter) My pulmonologist, who monitors my CPAP usage, stated "Sleep apnea tends to worsen with time and weight gain and his moderate OSA which was diagnosed in 2014 is more likely than not a progression of his symptoms that originated while he was on active military service". 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
10 hours ago, Cessnabc said:

He is talking about the progression of Sleep Apnea.

Based on the results of the initial sleep study, there were not enough events to be diagnosed with OSA.  The official diagnosis did not come until 2014.  At that time, I was put on CPAP.

I discharged in 2008.

This makes much more sense, thank you - I would ask your surgeon to write you a slightly different statement, indicating whether the apneas shown on your in-service (2007) sleep study were "the first manifestation" of your later diagnosed sleep apnea. I understand that that's basically what he's already said, but "progression" implies an already diagnosed condition that became worse, whereas "first manifestation" indicates a first symptom of a later diagnosed condition.

He'll still need to provide some sort of medical rationale to explain this opinion, likely something along the lines of "the obstructive/hypoapneas shown on the 2007 study are consistent with early sleep apnea, which continues to the present day" or something similar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you complain to the VA that your meds are causing or making your OSA worse they will just tell you to stop taking those meds.  No doubt opiates and drugs like Clonazepam make it worse so if you take those drugs the VA will give you fits if you have DX of OSA.    This has already been a big problem for me with my various doctors fighting about which drugs I should or should not take.  I would say just from my own experience the fatter you get the worse your OSA will get.  Now if you are disabled and cannot get around much you  are liable to put on weight.  This will make your OSA worse.  If you have DMII you will probably put on weight.  Just having OSA causes weight gain which in turn makes the OSA worse.   So it is all a feedback loop ending in our extinction.   I remember going nuts because I could not sleep in Vietnam and that is in my records.  There were not sleep studies in 1970 as far as I know.  I have long history of sleep problems but only found out about OSA about 4 years ago long after I had been DX'ed with DMII and CAD due to AO exposure.   We all need to find doctors who will write reports that are acceptable to the VA and provide medical rationale to connect OSA and any other non-presumptive disease to our service.  My current pulmonologist will not do that since he believes it does not matter what caused it only what will fix it.  The C-Pap failed and Inspire has failed to a substantial degree.   I guess I need one of our "hired gun" doctors.   Hey,  the VA has an army of hired guns that are ready to deny your claims until you are rotting in the ground.   Anyone know of decent and vet friendly docs who will help a vet?

 

                      As far as the vet who actually had a sleep study done in the service I think there is a natural progression theory from your first in-service sleep study to current study that says OSA.  Once upon a time I had a small army of shrinks that I could call on for help with the VA.  They are mostly retired now since I am 67 and they were all older than me when I got P&T.  If OSA is going to kill me I want the VA to take responsibility in part.  I have certainly gained weight with age and with the peripheral neuropathy which is secondary to DMII (A0) because I just can't walk two blocks without pain and I cannot even do other exercise due to the neuropathies in my hands as well.   It seems obvious that the SC conditions are caused by or made worse by the few non-SC conditions I have.   98% of doctors neither understand or want to understand VA rules and regs.  in order to write up an IMO/IME.   They shrink from making a medical opinion because they believe their future credibility or liability will be called into question.   They want to keep their petticoats clean while raking in money for bogus treatments and pushing new expensive drugs from the companies that visit them and always buy lunch.

 

 

             John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use