Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

  Click To Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Click To Read Current Posts 
  
 Read Disability Claims Articles   View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

SMC, TBI/PTSD

Rate this question


Vet Dog and wife

Question

My Husband is rated totally and permanently 100% disabled with TBI; he also has severe PTSD, which is unrated. he is service connected for both of these problems. he also has several other health issues which are probably service connected. My husband was in the military in the late 1970s.  he applied for and received 100%  V A compensation around 1997. 

the questions I have are:

1. Is my husband entitled to SMC,  housebound, or any other extra benefits?

2. are there any other issues we should know about?

 

Thank You for your help

 

 

Edited by Vet Dog and wife
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm not Ms berta obviously

However in your hubbys claims there could be some errors presented by the VA

CUE means CLEAR & UNMISTAKABLE ERROR! 

and usually filed in a last resort or getting the facts correct.

Maybe this will help you understand the use for CUE & Why its very important to understand.

In order to establish CUE, the appellant must demonstrate: (1) Either the facts known at the time of the decision being attacked on the basis for CUE were not before the adjudicator, or the law then in effect was incorrectly applied; (2) an error occurred based on the record and the law that existed at the time; and (3) had the error not been made, the outcome would have been “manifestly different.” Bouton v. Peake, 23 Vet. App. 70, 71 (2008). In other words, it must be undebatable that the VA made an error based on unconvertible facts or a misapplication of the law that existed at the time.

Successful CUE Claims

The following are some examples of successful CUE claims:

∙ VA’s failure to give a sympathetic reading to the veteran’s filings by determining all potential claims raised by the evidence, applying all relevant current laws and regulations. Moody v. Principi, 360 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

∙ VA’s failure to apply applicable, existing regulations or statute at that time. Look v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 157, 163-64 (1992).

∙ VA’s failure to follow the regulations that govern whether an existing disability ratingshould be reduced, namely 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.343 and 3.344. Olson v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. at 434; Ternus v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 370, 376 (1994); Sorakubo v. Principi, 16 Vet. App 120, 123-24 (2002).

∙ VA’s failure to properly apply the Schedule of Rating Disabilities. Myler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 571, 574-75 (1991).

∙ VA’s failure to apply 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b) which establishes a presumption of service connection for chronic diseases diagnosed in service. Groves v. Peake, 524 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

∙ VA’s failure to apply the regulation that governs conditions that preexist service. Joyce v. West, 19Vet. App. 36 (2005); see also Sondel v. West, 13 Vet. App. 213 (1999) and Akins v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 228 (1991).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

We also have CUE winners here and everything  anyone needs to know about CUE is in our CUE forum.

Until we can read the 1998 decision, however, we don't really have a clue on whether there was an actual CUE.:wacko:

We would need to see the 1998 rating sheet as well because that is where (in my opinion) the legal error occurred...and as I mentioned before there could well be more than one CUE in it.

No deadlines on filing CUE claims.

And Myler V Derwinski above is one of my FAVORITES !!!!! a Beauty but then again many here, as well as me, have had those beautys too.

I learned a little about CUE from NVLSP (VBM) but the most I learned was from the BVA....their denials of CUE as well as their awards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the help Buck and Berta,

Called the VA today, and they told me that he was awarded  100% SC PT due to head trauma with mood -disorder and PTSD code 9304. 

he was given 0% occipital area scar, skull code 7805 

Edited by Vet Dog and wife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Great  be sure and check the EED Rerto amount.

  They will adjust it on what he has been paid since then.

  so make sure they Adjust the retro accordingly.

Congratulation on his claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use