Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

hypothetical increase question

Rate this question


usmc2511

Question

probably a very stupid question but here it goes...........So just out of curiosity has anyone ever heard of a service connected condition, that has been rated for 7 years, when filing for an increase a VSR or RVSR questioning the rationale of a C&P doctor from the original grant of a claim. Ive got a buddy who was rated based on rationale and statement that said veteran should be awarded benefit of the doubt in this case and opined service connection should be granted(as least as likely as not). If the VSR or RVSR did ever question the rationale of a SC condition that was 7+ years old what steps, if any could they take. I know this wouldn't be a CUE because original rater went off C&P doc rationale, just wondering if they would ever try and sever service connection based on a difference of opinion years down the road. Or what are the main reasons to sever service connection years later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes mam, I was rated 10% for tinnitus but now it is tied into my 30% rating for menieres. I am about a week away from putting in an increase for menieres syndrome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I figured they lumped it in with the Meniere's but if you claim tinnitus as a separate SC,due to your service....they might award the 10% separately.

The Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Fast letter is here...I will find it and post it.

Many vets have it SCed due to their MOS.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
58 minutes ago, Berta said:

I figured they lumped it in with the Meniere's but if you claim tinnitus as a separate SC,due to your service....they might award the 10% separately.

The Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Fast letter is here...I will find it and post it.

Many vets have it SCed due to their MOS.

 

Ok great, thanks for the responses 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
8 hours ago, Berta said:

USMC vet- have you claimed and do you receive comp for the tinnitus?

I was awarded 10% for tinnitus when I was med boarded, I was infantry man in service.   When I was awarded 30% for menieres syndrome they lumped my tinnitus in with it. I am filing for an increase for my menieres coming up in the next week. I have all my ducks in a row, just wondering if they will schedule a C&P as well, since I already have a DBQ. Only thing that bothers me about having another C&P is that the last one I had they ordered VNG testing and said it was normal except for the caloric testing(75% weakness in left ear). I didn't believe that and had a private doc do one and he said there is absolutely no way to interpret my VNG as normal, and it was very clear I had menieres. Also had MRI and CT to rule out and central issues, all came back negative, which means it's all coming from the periphery.  If I take my VNG with me to C&P they shouldn't make me do another should they?  That test is awful and takes me down for a solid week after I am done with it. 

Edited by usmc2511
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

http://vets.yuku.com/topic/99876/VA-Fast-Letter-1035-Hearing#.WT2pPGjytnI

 

That is the Fast Letter I mean. Obviously infantry means noise exposure.

I hope you don't need another  VNG test. Others will opine on that.

I

I

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, there is no reason I should, my doc said they shouldn't ever need to do another because they have their diagnosis and it showed exactly what they were looking for so there is no reason to do it again. He did say I need an audiogram every year to watch for more hearing  loss or right ear involvement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use