Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

The VARO Develops Evidence To Deny Claim(Ankles)


I had a C&P exam for my ankle condition performed by QTC in July, 2016.

The QTC examiner( PA-C), service connected my ankle condition(bilateral)on his DBQ/ medical opinion and gave a concise rationale based upon service medical treatment records.


However... the VARO wouldn't render a decision after the favorable C&P exam.


Instead, I was sent for another C&P exam to Lake Baldwin(Orlando VAMC) five months later.


The second examiner(PA-C) wouldn't service connect my ankle disability(less likely as not) on his DBQ/medical opinion.


I asked the second examiner why was I having another C&P exam for the same condition because the first examiner told me he was service connecting my condition.

He typed on his DBQ what I said in CAPITAL LETTERS.


The latter examiner's DBQ/ is chock full of false statements concerning my medical evidence, especially my service treatment records.

He said there was no objective diagnosis in service when I actually had several for my ankles/feet/legs.


The VARO stated that the second examiner's opinion was more persuasive, and used the unfavorable C&P exam as the reason my claim was denied.


This second examiner mentioned he was seeking employment as the VA was laying him off.


At least that's some good news for other vets in the Orlando area so they don't have to face a dishonest examiner.






Edited by 63Charlie

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

My 2 cents.  Anyone Vet filing a new claim should Never, Never trust a VA examiner to the right thing. Before the claim is filed, you should already have at the ready an IMO from a board certified doc. Having this would have stopped the 2nd C&P and may on it's face depending on how thorough the opinion, killed the need for a C&P altogether. 

An IMO automatically starts tipping the scale in the Vets favor.

An IMO from a board certified Doc keeps away a faulty C&P, especially when dealing with PA's or VA docs not certified in the area you are claiming.

An IMO keeps the weight tilted in your favor if you need to appeal  due to a shitty RO that will not read the record. 

An IMO is money well spent, it is for the Vets benefit, Past , Present , and future, as well as his or her family, not to mention the sanity that will remain intact while he or she goes through the VA maze as the IMO will decrease the time and headache while fighting to get whats due.


It's time you get an IMO before you proceed any further.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

Thanks for the advice JR Reihs.

I'm thinking, at this point, no matter what evidence was submitted on my behalf, the VARO was determined to deny my claim.


I have requested a DRO hearing.


I HAVE submitted an IMO from my treating physician stating that my condition is, at least as likely as not, a condition incurred from my military service.

My doctor also cited medical evidence treatises from the National Institute of Health to correlate his diagnosis/medical opinion(s).

AND...it was a freebie to boot! 


The C&P examiners diagnosed osteoarthritis, without performing imaging studies.

Since the examiners work for the VA, they must have "Superpower Xray Vision".


My treating doctor used a 3.0 Tesla MRI study, and diagnosed tendon and ligament conditions/disabilities, along with arthritis of right ankle.


The PA s didn't know what was wrong, nor did they care.

It was lie... to deny, from the get-go.



Edited by 63Charlie

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

That is good news on the IMO.  Did the RO in the decision discuss in anyway the IMO?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Veterans need to be careful getting IMO's they need to make sure the Dr credentials are all intact board certified in the field of medicine of the veterans disability & to add they must use the VA set guidelines.

I have seen the VA go with the VA Dr's over a private Dr in different ways  either the private Dr was not certified or did not have the correct credentials to make his impression or was in the wrong field of medicine or not going  into strong detail to make his/her impression/ opine  to better out weigh the VA Dr's.

I agree a good IMO is usually favorable to the veteran

I believe this is called Relative Equipoise  or something like it. usually Relative Equipoise is a positive and if doubt  then it goes in favor of the veteran.

Edited by Buck52

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


   Welcome to the "VA world" where VA hires THEIR doctors, and pays them to write statements to deny.  The obvious solution is to pay your own doctor for a less biased opinion.  Trump says VA is the most corrupt organization in the US.  I hope lots of VA execs get fired with the new accountability laws.  The VA "hides" under what they proclaim to be a "Veteran friendly non adverserial system".  

Its way past time for VA lies to be exposed.  Most Vets have to fight VA tooth and nail for every benefit.  Remember, when VA employees can deny or delay you, this is party time for them.  Bonuses and parties...and favors for VA contractors.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines