Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
broncovet

Chevron Defernce under fire, this is good for Vets!!!!

Question

Its high time the VA is prevented from getting their way with Veterans, at Veterans expense.

The "Chevron" deference, from the 1980 Supreme Court, basically means that a government agency gets to interpret any 

laws pretty much how they see fit.  

Example:  In Howell, congress is quoted as saying:

Quote

The Secretary, citing to Senate Report No. 1745 (June 27, 1960), notes that in passing section 1114(s) Congress intended to provide additional compensation for veterans who were unable to overcome their particular disabilities and leave the house in order to earn an income as opposed to an inability to leave the house at all.

However, the VA has decided to deny many Veterans SMC S, if they show up to a c and p exam, as that means they 
"can" leave the house.  

The way I see this is that any TDIU Vet should get SMC S...because they are "unable to overcome their particular disabilities and leave the house in order to earn an income"...by defination of tdiu.  

In a recent interview between Senator Hatch, and Kavanaugh, Mr. Kavanaugh indicated that we need a "seperation of powers", that is, a "suggestion" that Chevron should be overturned. Mr. Kavanaugh was specifically addressing Chevron Deference, per Mr. Hatch's question. 

  Because of Chevron deference, VA gets away with a lot of stuff..they just interpret stuff to their own pleasing and we cant

do much about it because of Chevron Defernce.  We need Cheveron Deference overturned, so that VA does not continue to have its way with Vets.  

Im in a fight with VA over this very issue, that I have addressed above.  VA has "rewritten" congress intent, above to mean that the VEteran has to be "substantially confined" to his home.  This was not congress intent.  The Veteran can leave his home to go to the doctor, to get groceries, or anything else, he just cant leave the home "to earn an income" and get SMC S.  

By the VA making this law more restrictive than congress intended, many Vets are denied benefits that should get them.  And, this is just one example, VA pulls this stuff every day.  

Edited by broncovet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

the a-holes at the va threw this at me, demanding to know if I drove there, and my wife attended 2 out of 3 c&p exams, but then the VA made me repeat 2 exams. the way they demean a person if they can make it to an appointment is disgusting. Also have been treated badly when I walk some days on morphine a few feet without a cane. But when I was a quadriplegic, and in a wheel chair or bedridden, they overlook that.

 

My daughter said this to me when we discussed her future when she was going to start college. I will not go into the military for the way I see they treated you. She is very young, mid 20's, working on 2 master at the same time, and is a senior analyst at a Fortune 500. The military will not get people to serve if they screw around their parents. We had little help from the VA as they fought me the whole way. She has a lot of loans to pay for schooling. meanwhile, I was unable to help her as I lay sick in bed most of her childhood. I did what I could, but was too sick to function properly. Not going off subject, just saying the VA takes advantage of vets and twists everything in their favor. Duty to assist ==  >> 'My Ass'.

Edited by retiredat44
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

They did the same to me.  (On my C and P exam) for SMC S, they asked me if I drove there.  They did not ask me if I met the (Howell criteria, which includes Congress intent) at all, they focused on "non criteria", such as did I drive there, am I able to feed myself, and was I bedridden.  

VA delibertly rewrote the A and A criteria to sound like you have to be bedridden, noting that is only "one" of the ways to get A and A.  But VA makes you think, gee, you got out of bed, so you dont need a and a.  

I have to have help for lots of things I used to do myself.  I used to fix my own cars..now I cant even get under the car to change the oil.  I used to cut my own grass.  Now my feet hurt too much and I hire it done.  Of course, the VA never adjuticated my arthritis claim...they quietly called it "nsc" on a rating sheet, without giving me a written decision.  This is a violation of 38 CFR 3.103, which requires a written decision.  

If they dont make a decision, you cant appeal it, so you wont get it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Good info!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

in my last c&p, after 3, then 2 repeats, the last c&p, the psyc got angry with me when I asked what info he had so I did not know where to start. I had already been through several failed c&p with doctors from India or Pakistan, could not understand a word... then I go back on a 2 hundred mile drive sick and malaise... the head doctor shot back with a $hitty mean attitude saying 'are you going to kill yourself !? as both an attack and a meanness. I know I failed that one. I was so angry..... I could barley speak... I don't need the abuse from them.. I see no point in complaining, the fox guards the henhouse...

I wonder if they pull this shit with generals... and admirals... or lawyers...  or ????? disgusting......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

You should say something like  excuse me Dr  but did you read the part where my Dr mention blah blah blah...or whatever you needed him to read and give his report about,your not there because you want to be, your there so the Dr can ask you questions if he needs to .

sometimes  a Veteran will have enough evidence on record for the examiner to make his.her opinion...if you think something was not addressed during your C&P Speak up..

I think I had an examiner ask me if I was going to kill myself, I ''STARTED'' to say no but I am going to kill you if you don't get this shit right...(.no pun intended)

but it is frustrating when they ask you that when you have been medically examined/tested and diagnosed.

I did have one one time ask me that,  he said are you going to kill your self  if so how you going to do it.?..Do you want to hurt someone?... I answered sometimes I think about it.

on these foreign  Dr's if you can't understand them ask for an interpreter.  I had a VA Phyistrist  I could not understand..and this was about medications  I wanted to make sure what she was saying  so I ask for someone that understood her  to repeat it to me.

But I certainly understand what you mean how they are some times.

Edited by Buck52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines