Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C and P hypeetension

Rate this question


Gbing

Question

I submitted a few years worth of 140/100ish from private doctors and the Detroit VA. The Detroit VA said I need to be and prescribed me lisinopril for my BP. I had my c and p exam and the doctor gave me two 120/80 readings. Impossible. I've never had perfect BP, even on meds. I went home and it was 140/90.  I filed a dro appeal. Anyone have experience with this? I guess I'm saying... All of a sudden it's perfect at the exam?! 

Edited by Gbing
Clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It was perfect for these vets:

I am not saying Detroit manipulates the data in this alarming IG report but you should request a new C & P-use that IG report to reflect why you feel you have a legitimate concern.

And/or call the White House Veterans Hot Line:

1-855-948-2311

Do you take daily HBP readings at home and document them? That is always a good way to show what your HBP is, over a period of time.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I see it that you have 2 ways to refute this:

1.  Get an IMO/IME with more accurate blood pressure readings.  

2.  Challenge the blood pressure readings, that is dispute your medical records.  You have a right to do this under 38 cfr 1.579

   https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/1.579#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I just had a hypertension increase C&P on Friday.  I know I will not get an increase, but I wanted to get in the record my original readings from 2004 when I had an LOD (line of duty) while on active duty which led to my service connection for HBP.

With that said, I had quite a discussion with the examiner.  My issue is, while the VA might do it, medical facilities, both military and civilian do not take your blood pressure three time on two separate occasions as stated in the rating reg.  When I had my first high reading in 04, the Army nurse had me rest for 5 minutes and took again, still high and recorded it, once.  Then the LOD.  I was sent to a civilian doc, who's nurse took my BP with a high reading and then took it again on the other arm, and then documented my BP once.  The doc came in and he took my BP and it was high.  The bottom line is I may have had my BP checked more that once (3 times at one location), but they only record the one reading for the visit.  So, again, it is unreal to expect anyone other than the VA to check 3 BP times in a row and record it accordingly.

I did claim HBP and at the C&P exam in 04, the examiner did take my BP three times in a row, however, this was after taking  medicine for 3 months and so by then it was good.

Now, on Friday, the examiner did take my blood pressure at least three times, once before and once after the exam and with both arms both times.  It was mildly high, but not enough for compensation.

I did tell her, that the way the VA plays, I should just stop taking my meds for a couple months and get readings 3 times on 2 seperate days to meet the requirements and she said don't do that.  I told her I was kidding, but she did see my point.  She did tell me she had a diabetic not take his meds to get a more favorable rating.  She did not tell me how that panned out for that Veteran.

Just a stupid rule,

Hamslice

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use