Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sleep Apnea (Reopened Claim)

Rate this question


rk4435

Question

I was originally denied for Sleep Apnea in 2012.  My Pulmonologist that treats me for lung damage from Burn Pit Exposure believes that my Sleep Apnea is secondary to the exposure.  He even offered to write a nexus letter.  No one has ever offered help before, of course I accepted.

The claim is now reopened and I have submitted his letter.  If it is granted would the effective date be the date I reopened with new evidence, or the original date of the claim?

Thank you for any knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
1 hour ago, doc25 said:

[I'm guessing you are already service connected for Asthma? Is this correct? If yes, proceed and read below.

If no, you will need to get Asthma service connected first.]

Unfortunately, there is legal terminology that is required in a nexus of opinion.

Your Dr. has to state one of these phrases for a favorable nexus.

1. "Due to" (100% probability)

Ex. The veteran's claimed condition is due to the veteran's service-connected Asthma and the veteran's burn pit exposures in military service..

2. "More likely than not" (Greater than 50% probability)

Ex. The veteran's claimed condition is more likely than not, due to the veteran's service-connected Asthma and the veteran's burn pit exposures in military service.

3. "At least as likely as not" (Equal to or greater than 50% probability)

Ex. The veteran's claimed condition is at least as likely as not, due to the veteran's service-connected Asthma and the veteran's burn pit exposures in military service. 

 

Here is a study below I attached that you can show your doctor and see if he'll use it to make the link in his rationale.

Asthma_and_obstructive_sleep_apnea_More_than_an_as.pdf 325.14 kB · 0 downloads

I may be screwed, he made a clear link but did not use that succinct terminology in either letter. He offered to do the nexus letter and I do not feel comfortable asking him to do more.  His treatment and meds have given me a somewhat decent return for now, but the meds are not as effective as they were several months ago.  

As it is I am rated for Asthma, potentially constructive bronchiolitus.  Since it is a rated condition, if it becomes terminal my family will have benefits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
25 minutes ago, rk4435 said:

I may be screwed, he made a clear link but did not use that succinct terminology in either letter. He offered to do the nexus letter and I do not feel comfortable asking him to do more.  His treatment and meds have given me a somewhat decent return for now, but the meds are not as effective as they were several months ago.  

As it is I am rated for Asthma, potentially constructive bronchiolitus.  Since it is a rated condition, if it becomes terminal my family will have benefits. 

Screwed? Not so fast. Let's take into consideration:

#1. There is  a link that was made.

#2. A specialist made the link. A pulmonologist opinion carries more weight than a General Practice Dr., Physician Assistant, or a Nurse Practitioner as a C&P examiner

It doesn't hurt to ask your dr. to write it in the format that was mentioned. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You seem to have met the Caluza elements for secondary connection, anyway. 

#1. You met the criteria for current diagnosis of Sleep Apnea.

#2. You met the criteria for a service-connected disability.

#3. A nexus of opinion was provided. Albeit, it does not contain the legal terminology. It does raise a significant amount of reasonable doubt in your favor.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What we need to also look at is that:

#1. You had a sleep study done.

#2. The sleep study confirms you have sleep apnea.

#3. A diagnosis for sleep apnea was made. The diagnosis also has to state you need a "medically necessary" CPAP Machine

#4. You were issued a CPAP machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Are you aware:

§4.96  Special provisions regarding evaluation of respiratory conditions.

 

(a) Rating coexisting respiratory conditions. Ratings under diagnostic codes 6600 through 6817 and 6822 through 6847 will not be combined with each other. Where there is lung or pleural involvement, ratings under diagnostic codes 6819 and 6820 will not be combined with each other or with diagnostic codes 6600 through 6817 or 6822 through 6847. A single rating will be assigned under the diagnostic code which reflects the predominant disability with elevation to the next higher evaluation where the severity of the overall disability warrants such elevation. However, in cases protected by the provisions of Pub. L. 90-493, the graduated ratings of 50 and 30 percent for inactive tuberculosis will not be elevated.

 

Asthma is rated under 6602  and sleep apnea is rated under  6847..... the va does not normally give two separate ratings for these conditions instead they will give you one rating which will be the higher rating of one or the other.. for example if your asthma is rated at 60%  and your sleep apnea is rated 50% your will be 60% for both conditions.. or if the Asthma is rated 30% and the sleep apnea is rated 50% , you will receive one 50% rating....

I have seen a few cases on the BVA cite, where a veteran was rated separately for each condition, but that is far and few... normally it will not happen...

I have a case on appeal because of the special provisions listed above... 

I have appealed  because to rate sleep apnea as a lung condition is factually and medically incorrect and should not be included in the special provisions. Of course it will be denied but I have to try... otherwise in my case and likely yours as well it will not benefit you much or maybe not at all to even go thru the C/P and rating process...

My rating for asthma is 60% , my rating for copd is 100%, my sleep apnea rating is 50% --- I got one rating for all three conditions 100%.

                                                                                I am not a lawyer so take my opinions with a grain of salt...

If I had listened to the nay sayers, I would never have acheived any ratings after I was awarded TDIU in 1999. Now I have not one but two 100% ratings, a TDIU  and 4 SMC awards !  I say JUST GO For It

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” -Albert Einstein.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, doc25 said:

 

#3. A diagnosis for sleep apnea was made. The diagnosis also has to state you need a "medically necessary" CPAP Machine

#4. You were issued a CPAP machine.

 Note a diagnoses does not have to state that you need a cpap machine or that one was issue to you.

The only thing required is that a diagnoses of sleep apnea was made and that it is service connected  

(Even if your sleep study determines you need a cpap , there is no requirement that one must be issue, and no requirement that you must use it)

The actual ratings are listed below and they are self explanatory......... 

6847    Sleep Apnea Syndromes (Obstructive, Central, Mixed):

 

                  Chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor

                        pulmonale, or; requires tracheostomy............................................................... 100 

                  Requires use of breathing assistance device such as continuous

                        airway pressure (CPAP) machine....................................................................... 50 

                  Persistent day-time hypersomnolence ...................................................................... 30

                        Asymptomatic but with documented sleep disorder breathing          0        

 

 

Edited by Richard1954
corrected statement

                                                                                I am not a lawyer so take my opinions with a grain of salt...

If I had listened to the nay sayers, I would never have acheived any ratings after I was awarded TDIU in 1999. Now I have not one but two 100% ratings, a TDIU  and 4 SMC awards !  I say JUST GO For It

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” -Albert Einstein.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
17 hours ago, Richard1954 said:

"Asthma is rated under 6602  and sleep apnea is rated under  6847..... the va does not normally give two separate ratings for these conditions instead they will give you one rating which will be the higher rating of one or the other.. for example if your asthma is rated at 60%  and your sleep apnea is rated 50% your will be 60% for both conditions.. or if the Asthma is rated 30% and the sleep apnea is rated 50% , you will receive one 50% rating...."

 

Richard, I came across this today in my files:

"Furthermore, under 38 C.F.R. § 4.96, a separate rating can be assigned for asthma even when the veteran is receiving compensation for sleep apnea. While these respiratory conditions each impair his ability to breathe, each condition has distinct and separate symptomatology. The sleep apnea is caused by obstructive factors and results in disruption of breathing during sleep; the condition is alleviated by the use of CPAP. The asthma is caused by exposure to allergens and irritant particles and results in recurrent attacks of spasmodic contraction of the bronchi; the condition is alleviated by the use of bronchodilators. Because the symptomatology does not overlap, a separate rating should be assigned for the asthma. See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 261-62 (1994)."

This contradicts what you posted,but I cannot find a date on your quote.  I imagine yours is a newer version since the one I posted is from 1994. 

 My Asthma rating is 30%, the next level is 60% and I do not believe I meet the 60% criteria.  I nebulize medicine several times a day and have to use antibiotics to fight off bronchitis two or three times a year, but I think the 60% level requires steroids / Z pacs.  

 

 

Edited by rk4435
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
17 hours ago, Richard1954 said:

 Note a diagnoses does not have to state that you need a cpap machine or that one was issue to you.

The only thing required is that a diagnoses of sleep apnea was made and that it is service connected  

(Even if your sleep study determines you need a cpap , there is no requirement that one must be issue, and no requirement that you must use it)

The actual ratings are listed below and they are self explanatory......... 

6847    Sleep Apnea Syndromes (Obstructive, Central, Mixed):

 

                  Chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor

                        pulmonale, or; requires tracheostomy............................................................... 100 

                  Requires use of breathing assistance device such as continuous

                        airway pressure (CPAP) machine....................................................................... 50 

                  Persistent day-time hypersomnolence ...................................................................... 30

                        Asymptomatic but with documented sleep disorder breathing          0        

 

 

I stand corrected. The diagnosis doesn't need to state it, but it needs to be in the documentation.

If you still believe that the phrase "medically necessary" doesn't need to be present?

Let's consider the advisement of this veteran's law firm. 

The bad news is that this extra scrutiny by VA will be a trap for the unwary.  If a veteran doesn’t have a statement from the doctor saying the CPAP is medically necessary, it is an invitation for VA to deny the claim now.

https://veterans.perkinslawtalk.com/post/bad-secret-change-to-va-sleep-apnea/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use