Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

C&P exam ptsd

Rate this question


Kevin Hollins

Question

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

The answer turns, IMHO, on whether or not your doctor stated something close to:

"The Veteran's (incident on board ship) was due to the Veterans own willful misconduct".  

In other words, if you get into trouble, especially with alcohol in the service, the doctor makes a judgement call as to whether or not (your in service injury) was due to willful misconduct.

If this doc said you were guilty of willful misconduct, this will likely preclude SC.  

However, if they denied benefits because of getting drunk or stoned ONCE, the VA would go out of business and shut down.  

If the VA does not have evidence in your file that your (incident on board ship) was due to your willful misconduct, then you should be okay.  

"Willful misconduct" determination is made "at the time of the incident", and not years later when we apply for benefits.  If the doctor does "not" state whether this was willful misconduct, then its presumed your incident was not willful misconduct.  

The doc has to say its willful misconduct.  

However, your admission to the c and p examiner "can be used as evidence against you".  

The short answer is we dont know if your statement will lead to a denial or not.  This will likely be a judgement call by the decision maker, and, it can be appealed.  

Looking to the future, you are not medically competent to diagnose your own illnesses, so I would also presume you are not competent to determine "willful misconduct"..a medical determination.  

Therefore, altho your statement(s) can be used against you, You can not diagnose yourself, and you can not determine "willful misconduct".  This is just my opinion, and a decision maker may decide otherwise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No.  I had two dui.  One in service and one out of service.  Last one was over 10 years ago.  The first one in service had nothing to do with the things that caused PTSD (and TBI in my case).  I told them everything.  I told them I binged drink back in my military days too; and occasionally when I got out.  Same with MJ use.  TBI was a different story.  I did have a C&P examiner try to vaguely blame cognitive issues on alcohol and MJ.  She will loose as I have 3 other opinions stating otherwise.  But it is the VA.  They may disregard the 3 nexus and dbq's and go with hers.  They will loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

the answer is situational and contextual. Broncovet is on target.

If your DUI was related somehow to the event on the ship...like you got drunk, got arrested, went back to ship still drunk, and THEN had the event, then yes they can make a causal chain argument.

If you were documented, before the event, to be drunk on duty or hungover on duty, then the DUI would just be another brick in the wall.

If however the DUI and or any record of drunk on duty, bad behavior, etc, happened AFTER your in-service event, then it can be made to work in your favor. It would amount to "see bad thing XXX happened and I started falling apart right then.. "
 

Until you get a decision from the VA, there is not much any of us can really say that will directly help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It was after the incident when the ship returned to port while at sea  me seeing my Shipmate die at sea and me almost getting washed overboard during a bad storm where I was ordered to do a very hazardous task  

Thanks for your feedback

Edited by Kevin Hollins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
5 minutes ago, Kevin Hollins said:

Thanks for your feedback

I believe everyone here is supportive of you, and it is great that you responded with that info.

sadly my last sentence in that post still applies.

Until you get a decision from the VA, there is not much any of us can really say that will directly help you.

If you want to start redacting the evidence you have while you wait for the BBE that would be a good use of time. Then redact the BBE if it doesn't award you what you are asking for, and then post all of them so we can help suggest things to attack that potential denial.

If you have not ordered your C-file I would suggest you do that now, it takes like six months these days and your C&P is likely to already be there by the time they create your cdrom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use