Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Remanded Appeal

Rate this question


SOMVET

Question

My VA appeal for back, knee and neck has been remanded for appeal (third attempt). I now have a DBQ scheduled for the 30th of this month. Since my initial denial for my claims, I have had my C5-C6 fused and had 2 knee surgeries on my right knee. I have 4 other herniated discs in my neck needing attention and  I no longer have, according to my surgeon, any meniscus remaining. He stated that I am bone on bone and have arthritis behind my patella and my next step is to have the knee replaced.  What amazes me is I have it documented in my service records of knee, neck and back pain and  the VA still denies my claim.  Is there anyone out there that has jumped through these hoops? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Some of us feel like we have jumped through all of the hoops.  I won at the BVA after a second remand.  It is frustrating when the judge calls out the rater for not reviewing all evidence provided.  During these remands the RO works a glaciered speed, when they are told to expedite the claim on the remand.  My C&P's were preformed by the same doctors that performed the original.  The doctor defended his position from the previous C&P and accused me of being a malingerer.  The BVA claimed he had made an opinion that was not his to make.  After my second remand the lawyer threated a writ of mandamus and my case immediately went active and was completed within months.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 hours ago, Berta said:

SOMVET-I am repeating something I poste here elsewhere this AM.

The VA is not going to do a thorough review of your SMRs to seek any nexus.

This is the job for vets themselves to do- the VA might list your SMRs as evidence but most often the vet themselves needs to highlight specific copies of their SMRs to establish a nexus.

I had a local vet about 10-12 years ago who had Vet reps as his POA  and also two lawyers at the CAVC and kept losing his case due to no proven nexus.

I had his complete SMRS from the early 1960s, very difficult to decipher and it took me a lot of time ( time I sure don't have anymore) to prepare a nexus argument and to take it to his non VA doctor- who then prepared an excellent IMO for him, referring directly to the SMRs I found that support his inservice disability, which was never diagnosed properly by the Mil.

He won. What gets me is that his reps ( who asked me to help him while they were messing up my claim)and his lawyers never even read his BVA denial, and that denial held a clue, that helped me prove his inservice nexus.They never eve toughed his SMRs.

The vet could have done that himself -that got me too- and he was very difficult to deal with-probably why his Vet reps didn't want to help him anymore.

Vets have to do this themselves. I assume you did have entries in your SMRs and that those conditions have been  continuous since service, and that VA can find no other cause or etiology for your current condition.

Is there anything in the remand that you can do , instead of waiting for VA to do it?

 

What amazes me is the VA will deny SC even when the evidence is in the service records.  In addition to my service records I sent copies of my knee surgeon, neck surgeon and chiropractor evaluations with x rays.  I don't know what more is needed prior to my DBQ next week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
19 hours ago, 63Charlie said:

Yeeessss.

Shady stuff going on with veterans compensation.

Hire a lawyer if you don’t have one

Will hiring an attorney really help?  I have no idea what they charge or if they take a percentage of the award,  which I would be reluctant to give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My IMEO (you can read the current in the IMO section) found out that the C&P physician stated I had all gulf war presumptives that occured in service since I was the only one that actually went to the my NAS clinic or flight surgeon right after the deployment numerous times, and the Rater denied it. I moved on with life because at the time I wanted life and wasn't going to wait. There was times that I google my problems and found snippets on this and the other site in the mid 2000s but I was so broken down.

The only person at almost the same time discharge time as me, obtain 100% with no appeals was Jessica Lynch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
10 minutes ago, Oceanbound said:

My IMEO (you can read the current in the IMO section) found out that the C&P physician stated I had all gulf war presumptives that occured in service since I was the only one that actually went to the my NAS clinic or flight surgeon right after the deployment numerous times, and the Rater denied it. I moved on with life because at the time I wanted life and wasn't going to wait. There was times that I google my problems and found snippets on this and the other site in the mid 2000s but I was so broken down.

The only person at almost the same time discharge time as me, obtain 100% with no appeals was Jessica Lynch

That may be the route I go if this DBQ does not bear fruit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, SOMVET said:

Will hiring an attorney really help?  I have no idea what they charge or if they take a percentage of the award,  which I would be reluctant to give up.

Do you have your c-file? That is the first most important step to take before asking or answering anything further. Your c-file is like the book report you turned in blank and know nothing about it. So have can you present yourself to VA attorneys before lawyering up and having them take you on as a client? 

Order your c-file and after obtaining it categorize it in a spread sheet becauss its not in order, so you then have to go through it page by page numbering them 

Learn the 38 CFRs

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use