I have seen a pattern in the 10 plus years I have been on hadit. Many times, the condition the Veteran thought would be a "no brainer" SC is denied, while the condition he felt he had little or no chance of being SC winds up being the winner, winner chicken dinner. Even for myself, I noticed that almost every time, I was suprised by "at least something" in every VA decision. In other words, the decision maker saw it differently than I did, sometimes more favorable, and sometimes less favorable. I have been through about a dozen VA decisions, about 6 BVA decisions, and 3 trips to the CAVC. So, out of 19 decisions "not one" went completely the way I could predict, in every aspect. A couple were more favorable than I predicted, but most were less favorable. Some were both: They denied stuff I thought should have been awarded, while they suprised me by granting stuff that I did not anticipate.
I dont recommend you try to impress VA with your knowledge of presumptive, aggravation, M21, 38 CFR, CAVC, and/or medical knowledge. Just apply.
Example: Dont apply for a right medial lateral miniscal tear of the femoral artery. Doctors could well differ on that diagnosis, and you may be wasting time, having to apply again becaue you were diagnosied with the lateral miniscal tear of the Veinous minusca.
Instead: Apply for knee problems to include aggravation, primary secondary, etc. on both knees, especially the left.
Its okay to know this stuff, but you dont have to "lay down" your cards to VA while the dealer is still dealing. Wait until all the betting is over, and you have been awarded benefits or denied.
Now, if you are appealing, its ok to "propose your own entitlement hypothesis" as well as your own diagnosis theory. But, since you are neither a lawyer nor a medical professional, then your opinion does not matter anyway. If you are a medical professional, its ESPECIALLY important "not" to try to show off your medical knowledge.
Why?
Did you know that nurses and doctors make some of the worst patients? The treating physicians and treating nurses often have opinions different than yours, and its rarely a good idea to get into a debate with them as far as vA benefits are concerned.
Its okay to tell your doc you "question" his diagnosis or treatement, as well as the nurse, but mostly, if you dont trust your doctor or nurse, then get a different doc or nurse.
Many times, "less is more". Have you ever "spouted off" and wished you could "reel those words back into your mouth"? Well I have. Its even worse with VA. Once you send them a letter with your opinion, they can use that opinion against you forever. So, its often best not to mention your opinions, but rather let VA figure it out.
Example: Lets say you think you have an "entitlement theory" that suggests you should get tdiu. However, VA looks in your file and can not find any doctors who opine that your "unable to maintain SGE" due to sc conditions. However, the decision maker decides, instead, you meet the criteria for 100 percent PTSD. You are done! Most of the time you dont need to worry about it.
Question
broncovet
I have seen a pattern in the 10 plus years I have been on hadit. Many times, the condition the Veteran thought would be a "no brainer" SC is denied, while the condition he felt he had little or no chance of being SC winds up being the winner, winner chicken dinner. Even for myself, I noticed that almost every time, I was suprised by "at least something" in every VA decision. In other words, the decision maker saw it differently than I did, sometimes more favorable, and sometimes less favorable. I have been through about a dozen VA decisions, about 6 BVA decisions, and 3 trips to the CAVC. So, out of 19 decisions "not one" went completely the way I could predict, in every aspect. A couple were more favorable than I predicted, but most were less favorable. Some were both: They denied stuff I thought should have been awarded, while they suprised me by granting stuff that I did not anticipate.
I dont recommend you try to impress VA with your knowledge of presumptive, aggravation, M21, 38 CFR, CAVC, and/or medical knowledge. Just apply.
Example: Dont apply for a right medial lateral miniscal tear of the femoral artery. Doctors could well differ on that diagnosis, and you may be wasting time, having to apply again becaue you were diagnosied with the lateral miniscal tear of the Veinous minusca.
Instead: Apply for knee problems to include aggravation, primary secondary, etc. on both knees, especially the left.
Its okay to know this stuff, but you dont have to "lay down" your cards to VA while the dealer is still dealing. Wait until all the betting is over, and you have been awarded benefits or denied.
Now, if you are appealing, its ok to "propose your own entitlement hypothesis" as well as your own diagnosis theory. But, since you are neither a lawyer nor a medical professional, then your opinion does not matter anyway. If you are a medical professional, its ESPECIALLY important "not" to try to show off your medical knowledge.
Why?
Did you know that nurses and doctors make some of the worst patients? The treating physicians and treating nurses often have opinions different than yours, and its rarely a good idea to get into a debate with them as far as vA benefits are concerned.
Its okay to tell your doc you "question" his diagnosis or treatement, as well as the nurse, but mostly, if you dont trust your doctor or nurse, then get a different doc or nurse.
Many times, "less is more". Have you ever "spouted off" and wished you could "reel those words back into your mouth"? Well I have. Its even worse with VA. Once you send them a letter with your opinion, they can use that opinion against you forever. So, its often best not to mention your opinions, but rather let VA figure it out.
Example: Lets say you think you have an "entitlement theory" that suggests you should get tdiu. However, VA looks in your file and can not find any doctors who opine that your "unable to maintain SGE" due to sc conditions. However, the decision maker decides, instead, you meet the criteria for 100 percent PTSD. You are done! Most of the time you dont need to worry about it.
Edited by broncovetLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
2
2
Popular Days
Jan 12
8
Jan 11
4
Top Posters For This Question
Dustoff1970 3 posts
broncovet 2 posts
Vync 2 posts
Buck52 2 posts
Popular Days
Jan 12 2020
8 posts
Jan 11 2020
4 posts
Popular Posts
paulstrgn
I agree with "KISS" but let's face it, if the VA raters would actually read what we submit then we would try to nudge/lead them in the right direction. But with that said when you get a rater who does
Dustoff1970
I have found both methods work in combination. I start off with the KISS approach in the first several paragraphs of stating my claim arguments and the most important evidence I think will surely be
Vync
I know being nice is usually the best policy. However, I am not concerned if the VA employees get irritated. It's not like it was when I filed my first claims 25 years ago. They can now hold bad emplo
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now