Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Functional Status, Rates Of Trauma, And Personal Hardships Of Women And Men Who Applied For Va Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (ptsd) Disability Benefi

Rate this question


Guest allan

Question

86. Functional Status, Rates of Trauma, and Personal Hardships of Women and Men who applied for VA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disability Benefits, 1994 to 1998

M Murdoch, Minneapolis VAMC Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research; K Halek, Minneapolis VAMC Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research; L Fortier, Minneapolis VAMC Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research

Objectives: The poor overall functioning and high rates of trauma and personal hardships in men who seek service connection (SC) for PTSD has been well described, but little comparable data is known about women who seek SC for PTSD. Our goals were to describe and contrast these parameters in a large, nationally representative group of men and women who applied for VA PTSD disability benefits between 1994 and 1998.

Methods: Cross sectional, mailed survey of 4,819 randomly selected men and women. The sample represented 3% of all men and 57% of all women in the parent population. The survey questionnaire was composed of well-validated measures.

Results: 3337 veterans returned surveys (69%). Most men (76%) served during Vietnam; most women, in the post-Vietnam era (41%). Men's mean age was 55 (SD = 11); women's, 41 (SD = 10). Forty-four percent of men and women reported annual incomes of $20,000, but men were 1.37 times more likely to be SC for PTSD. Women were 1.5 times more likely than men to be employed.

Medical comorbidities were low for both genders (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores: men: 0.31, SD = 0.76; women: 0.20, SD = 0.52), but PTSD symptomatology, as measured by the Penn Inventory, was high. 72% of men and 68% of women had Penn Inventory scores > 35, denoting PTSD. Mean physical functioning scores for men were 17.2 (SD = 5) and 16.2 (SD = 4.5) for women, compared to a national norm of 29.5 (SD = 2.1). Overall role functioning, as measured by the Social Adjustment Scale, was 2.8 (SD = 0.8) for both men and women. These scores were almost twice as poor as that estimated for community norms and 1.4 times worse than norms for persons with schizophrenia.

Combat exposure rates were 29% in women and 94% in men. Rates of in-service sexual assault were 71% in women and 4% in men. Of a checklist of 11 post-service stressors, on average, women endorsed 5 (SD = 3) and men, 4 (SD = 2). More than half the women and men reported serious economic hardships or traumatic, personal losses. Thirty-eight percent of women and 29% of men, said they had been the victim of a serious crime; 40% of women and 17% of men said they had been seriously hurt by someone they knew. Additionally, 66% of women reported emotional abuse and neglect; 54% said they had been sexually assaulted after leaving the military.

Conclusions: Despite younger age, slightly fewer medical comorbidities, and higher employment rates, women and men reported similar levels of PTSD symptomatology, physical functioning, and overall role functioning. Both groups were severely impaired in terms of physical and role functioning, and both reported high rates of trauma and personal hardships. However, post-service trauma and personal hardship rates for women were substantially higher.

Impact: Our data show that women seeking SC for PTSD are as severely impaired functionally as men. As with men, clinicians should be aware of the high rates of trauma and personal hardships in these women's backgrounds.

Source: http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/meetings/2001/HSRD2001AMab86.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use