Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

What SMC level should I be rated?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

My current VA rating for veteran w/spouse is being paid SMC L1 since 2018.

Last month I won my BVA appeal for CRPS both upper extremities but my rating did not change.

The board granted the appeal but sent it back to the Houston RO to rate.

Should I be rated "R" for having two separate L1 ratings or do you think I should be rated higher (at least O)?

Can you become an HadIt patron with a 1 time donation? Be happy too.

Current rated disabilities:

L1 - Loss of use both feet rated on 8/24/2020 effective date 1/26/2018 (7-foot surgeries resulting in permanent use of mobility devices)

L1 - (A&A) permanent need for Aid and Attendance rated on 8/24/2020 effective date 8/21/2019 (on account of being so
helpless due to complex regional pain syndrome & lumbar degenerative arthritis with intervertebral disc syndrome)

100% - 8/24/2020 effective date 1/26/2018 loss of use of both feet

30% - 4/10/2014 lumbar degenerative arthritis with intervertebral disc syndrome

 

(CRPS in all four extremities)

20% -   06/05/2015 complex regional pain syndrome left upper extremity

30% -   02/05/2020 complex regional pain syndrome right upper extremity

20% -   04/10/2014 left lower extremity complex regional pain syndrome with tibial nerve impairment

20% -   04/10/2014 right lower extremity posterior complex regional pain syndrome with tibial nerve impairment

 

10% - 10/09/2014 tinnitus

00% - 10/09/2014 bilateral hearing loss

20% - 05/25/2016 left ankle tendonitis and chronic regional pain syndrome

20% - 05/25/2016 right ankle tendonitis

10% - 04/12/2012 scar, s/p right plantar fasciectomy, thigh graph, fibromatosis

20% - 04/12/2012 scars, s/p left plantar fasciectomy, thigh graph, fibromatosis

10% - 04/12/2012 s/p left plantar fasciectomy, thigh graph, fibromatosis (now rated as bilateral)

thank you,

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

SMC ratings are complex and are very specialized.  For the best answer, the "top gun" on SMC is CCK law.  You can call them and ask at no charge. 

Or listen to this: https://cck-law.com/video/special-monthly-compensation-smc/

But here is MY answer, but I am admittedly not an expert on high levels of SMC:

     Your SMC is going to be based less on your disability percentages, more on "loss of use".  Your post did not state which,  parts you have loss of use on, other than loss of both feet.    (Yes, I know there is an exception, and a glaring exception is Statuatory SMC S, which is a single 100 percent plus an additional 60 percent combined).  

     But you are already past SMC S..when you have SMC L (Aid and Attendance).   I dont know if you are eligbile for higher levels of A and A, because I dont know the degree of care needed by caregiver.  Generally the higher levels of A and A, are for those who require a NURSE for things like changing IV's, and other "NURSE" requirements.  Just bringing food, or washing your clothes, does not require a nursing degree.  

     SMC increases by "half steps" based on severity.   https://cck-law.com/blog/newsspecial-monthly-compensation-series-smc-l/

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hello Broncovet,

Thanks for the advice. Contacted CCK-Law and they completed a review of my case. They agreed that I was under rated and filed a higher level review. Will let everyone know once the case gets settled. There is always hope:)

Merry Christmas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Christmas, what a wonderful gift you could give by donating to hadit.com. 

I do not have much but donated $50 to help the thousands of veterans who use this site.

If everyone could donate even $5 to $10 what a difference it will make for veterans! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Arm Chair Ranger:

    Thanks for the follow up, and thank you (in behalf of hadit) for your contribution even at a time when it was not easy for you to contribute.

In my opinion, its fantastic news CCK law reviewed your file and agreed to represent you in seeking higher SMC levels.  

Since they are the top gun in SMC, there is no doubt in my mind they are correct, and you will be getting a higher level of SMC, its just a matter of when.  

      It was a smart move contacting CCK.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use