Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva remand for loss of use under smc

Rate this question


Mr cue

Question

Now here is another example of the bva try to delay and develop evidence to denied. After a cavc remand.

Ok I have a claim for smc r higher level in home care.

Now I denied get a bva decision on that and see how it say higher level smc.

So now I will not get a decision for smc r until my case is send back to the board. This is crazy.

Now smc and increase rating are two different thing. Smc is Based on the record and effective by the record.

Well my only hope to get pass all these delays is my petition.

My petition was expidate by court due to my need of in home care. And the cavc case that remand it the bva.

Do u see how the judge stated that my effective date for smc. Are downstream issue. And I have not disagree so the board doesn't have jurdation.

How is a cavc remand issue a downstream issue. Lol 

See when u do the nod now you will get a new docket number.

U will not have the cavc remand docket which is to be expidate.

This is how the bva and ro hold cavc remands. And there no longer in the system as a cavc remand. Not legal.

If I had not done the petition or understood. I would have been waiting years for them to address this.

I am venting again.

Oh and I did denied the exam. These qtc ppl are crazy. They will not tell me when it will be send back.

So now a outside company has add months to the claim process because they don't return exam or claims back to ro.

Smh now I got to fight qtc to return my issue back to ro

 

 

 

IMG_20210731_194947472.jpg

IMG_20210731_194959665.jpg

IMG_20210731_195010132.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I remember Yulooking.  I had a cue that any reasonable person would have recognized instantly given the evidence.  But I was asking for big retro and the VA just delayed it and denied it all the way to the Vet Court.  I was put in a position to where I had to prove a negative.  I had to prove the VA did not consider my IMO way back in 1972.  It was impossible since the VA did not even list all evidence in those days.  VA said they considered my IMO which, of course, they did not. I lost.  I hope you win Mr. Cue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yea I am in a new fight for the smc that is owe to me.

I have been tdiu pt 60% for 25 years 

The board granted me 3 month of smc s form when I apply.

I fight all the way to us court court set a side the 3 month smc s. Tell board to address earlier period.

It get to board  they volate the order

they remand to droc DC to grant the same effective dates in the first instance.

Than make me do a new nod and remove it from the cavc remand docket and place it it the new appeal system with a new 2021 docket date. Lol 

So now I sit with a set a side order from the court.

And my issues are now treated as a new appeal.

They refuse to even merge them back with the cavc remand order docket.

 

See if I didn't no better the case would be sitting for years. With them volating the set a side order.

So I have them by the balls.

They court order then to adjudicated smc o and r. Because of my need of in home care.

The board has it with this remand for loss of use. And refuse to give a decision.

After they advance my case do to my need of in home care.

I can't even get a decision or denied for 4 year I been fight just for this.

I point all this out to tell veterans look at the purple book.

It will help you fight these va games.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ok this is one of the two issues that was remand.

I didn't go to there loss of use exam.

So is this the one that got denied.

If so then it either the smc o or r that got granted.

This is going to drive me crazy. Lol.

Man I really ain't going to know what to do with myself once Mr Carpenter  take over my cases. Smh

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use