Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New To Board, Can't Pull Up The Link

Rate this question


Capt.

Question

Hello and yes I am new to this board so try and be patient with me. I have tried to pull up the link to the subject about getting a doctor to write an opinion or nexus. I have the link in another post but when I pull it up it will not open. the link is http://www.vehu.med.va.gov/v5hu/vehu2005/p.r-%20finalA.pdf . I have been fighting peripheral neuropathy for about 7 or 8 yrs and have been tested since 02 with diagnosis in 04 and 06. It is pointing to chemical contamination and I was at Fort Greely in 71-73. I have filed the claim with DAV in Feb but I am so far down the road with it that I can't rush the system to help me. I have tried to get the va neurologist to give me an opinion. I even supplied him with some evidence showing the results of contamination of the post with chemicals,,,nuclear reactor with discharging problems, agent orange contamination at sights monitored, testing of vx, sarin, nerve agents, biological weapons, lead , abestos, arsenic, and many more that cause neuropathy. I even sent him my personal doctors nexus after he reviewed all the evidence and said in his letter that "it is more likely than not that my disease is coming from the chemicals" . The Va neurologist who in his medical report, wanted to know the cause of the neuropathy. I only recently this year and have gotten all the documents concerning the contamination evidence. He said that after he reviewed this evidence it was "very compelling" but it could have come from anywhere and he was not my "primary health care doctor". He said I had to talk to him to see if he will sign an opinion. That is tomorrow and I am bringing some of the documents and will ask him to for this. I know they are "schooled" by the va not to fill out nexus that could help the vet. However I read on a post that they must if asked, to fill out opinion by law. How do you make them do this? I am going to see another neurologist this next week and try to get his opinion after he examines me an looks at the 3 emg reports from the VA and their opinions and of course my documents showing the chemicals there. I am in so much pain now that I cannot sleep and it is starting to effect my motor functions. I am taking ambian for that and the VA has been uping my dosage for the neurontin but it does not work. I am hoping to get another opinion to file with my claim as the VA is just not cooperating. I am depressed and have seen my doctor and the social worker because I can' t sleep from the pain and am having motor function problems.I am going thru depression and have told my DAV rep to file a claim for this too. Does anyone have any knowledge or can help with info about getting doctors with va to write opinions and nexus. Also what kind of battle am I in for? I am probably going to hire one of two lawyers I have talked to that I can hire after June 20,2007 (New law goes into effect)for representing me if they deny my initial and when the NOD is filed. That is assuming they deny me. Sorry for the long post but if I could show my VA doctor that he has to by law fill out an opinion then I would like that before tomorrows meeting with him. Thank you for all the good post and info. CC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hello and thank you all for the help ,,,,,it is really a blessing so realize I am searching for help to deal with these people. I wish I could have had all of the documents 3-4 years ago before I started getting worse. I am now behind the time frame to hold them off. I will say that the evidence from the Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation reports list the contaminates and remediation from this post. It is very compelling. Also the BRAC reports are listing 2,4,5 T, 2,4,5 DDT, 2,4,5,DDD and some others.....agent orange. Everyone thinks Alaska is so cold but actually the summers were lots of sunlight from May till Sept and the plant life exploded. Ft. Greely is 650000 acres so there was lots to do with keeping vegetation down and the AO was used and still contaminated in several sites as well as the Post Well water according to the documents. The Army prototype sm1a nuclear reactor had so much trouble, it is entombed probably longer than most of us will live. The contamination at Jarvis creek is documented and the well showed contamination also. Throw in Lead, Arsenic, Abestos and Thallium, and about 12 -14 other contaminates leading to Peripheral Neuropathy and you can see why they closed the post in 1995 and moved the Army Strategic Missle Command to another location there. Many of the sites are still under "Administrative Controls" and COPC which are something labeled as concerns, also sites as "unresolved". I am scheduled for the VA tommorrow to discuss my meds and this pain. I am going to ask him for an opinion and take him some of the documents to look at. He is probably going to give me the same "no" routine. I have contacted Jill Matthews already but may have to wait until we get some kind of ruling. I do not have the money to be able to hire Dr. Bash but would gladly like him to look at my records and maybe I can figure this out. I already have my MD examine my evidence and the documents. He has rendered the letter and signed it "at least as likely as not". He read the documents and said it was unbelievable what went on and how noone was responsible. There is actually months of reasearch available and thousand of pages of documents. One thing I have noticed . Alot of valuable documents from the EPA and DOD are there but when you try to open a link .......you guessed it , it will not open. So there is a lot of evidence that "they" will not release. The test from the nerve agents and biological weapons went on until 68 or 69 but there are many missing and unaccounted for , even UXO's . And things buried that were not suppose to be disposed of. No one watching the hen house back then and being so remote and the test post that it was...... lots of things were not done properly and according to regulations. Whether Military or Environmental. One more thing ...the protection for DOD offered by the EPA is unreal. It is such a joke how the EPA will not go up against the DOD. I know I am in for a long run but these people have more time than I do and will probably bury me before I can do anything. Once again , thank you so much for all of your help. This has been a help and you folks are on top of alot of this. C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes , Berta, thank you for your help .....I cannot find the right procedure for the doctor to write a nexus to meet their requirements properly. Can you supply that and some information for Dr. Bash and his contact info. Thanks again....C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The information in the post just below this one from URl

http://www.vehu.med.va.gov/vehu/vehu2005/p...r-%20FinalA.pdf

is a

VHA Practitioner’s Guide to Information Law dated - May 2005

1. PURPOSE: This Guide is intended to provide VHA Health Care Practitioner’s an

easy reference to understand and properly implement federal confidentiality law

requirements in a clinical setting involving patient records and information derived from

such records.

2. USE OF GUIDE: The Guide is divided into different Sections. Each Section has a

title for easy reference. Under each Section, there are a series of questions often asked by

VHA health care practitioners. By referring to the question and corresponding answer,

you will be able to more fully understand which laws apply to your situation and provides

general guidance on whether you have lawful authority to release patient

records/information. Please note that this Guide is intended as an instructional tool and

that you should contact the facility Privacy Officer and/or your Regional Counsel if you

have questions.

The main objective of this guide is to train health care professionals on legal procedures of safe guarding

patients right of privacy and HIPPA laws.

The main parts of this memo that allows healthcare professionals to provide information for veterans trying to obtain their benefits are as follows.

SECTION III

DISCLOSURES TO THE PATIENT

1. Are there any limitations on what I can disclose to a patient from his own

medical records?

A. Generally, you may freely disclose any and all information about a patient

directly to the patient. The only exception to this rule is if you believe that the disclosure

of the information or record might somehow injure the patient either mentally or

physically. As an example, if there is information supplied by the spouse such as a letter

that is in the patient’s records that you believe would be mentally injurious to disclose,

you could refuse to provide that letter to the patient. Under these circumstances there are

special procedures that should be followed to permit the disclosure of this sensitive

information through the assistance of a trained health care professional. Contact your

facility Privacy Officer for more information.

2. If a patient asks for a copy of his medical records, what can I give the patient?

A. If requested, you may give a patient a copy (for instance) of his progress note

of today’s visit or laboratory results if you believe it is necessary to assist the patient in

understanding his/her medical condition, i.e. educational purposes. Under these

circumstances, the patient does not have to sign any form nor is any type of accounting or

tracking necessary.13

B. If a patient asks for a complete copy of his records for whatever purpose, the

patient must go to Release of Information (ROI) to obtain a copy through that office.

Please remember that VA must first get a written request for a set of the records

and is permitted to charge for the cost of reproduction of the records.

3. If a patient asks me to fill a form out for him in order for him to obtain a drivers

license or to obtain SSN or VA benefits, am I required to do this?

A. If you are asked to fill out a form to assist a patient in obtaining veteran’s

disability or pension benefits, you are required to provide a descriptive statement and

opinion with respect to that patient’s medical condition, employability and degree of

disability. See VHA Directive 2000-029. At the end of the form, the health care

provider should add a statement that the opinion is not to be considered binding or

conclusive on VA for a determination of benefits. Once the form has been completed, it

should be sent to the ROI office for a proper accounting and release.14

B. This Directive indicates that VHA health care providers may provide medical

opinions for other purposes such as obtaining SSA benefits or motor vehicle driver’s

licenses. However, completing such a form depends on the time constraints of the

13 FAQ No. 3

14 VHA Directive 2000-029; FAQ No. 5

VHA Practitioner’s Guide to Information Law

8 May 2005

physician. If the patient’s primary care facility is at the VAMC and a physician knows

that the patient is not being seen anywhere else, this should be one factor to consider on

whether to assist the patient in completing a form. Once the form is completed, it should

be sent to the ROI office so that it can be sent directly back to the patient. However, if

the patient wishes the form to be sent to any one other than the patient, the patient should

provide a prior written authorization to release the form via the ROI office.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use