Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sc'ed For Two Conditions

Rate this question


john999

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I just got SC for two conditions secondary to DMII. If I had not read the VBM I would not have known to file for the conditions. The conditions are related to arteriosceloris in my legs which is a no-brainer for DMII. The problem was revealed during a CT scan for another problem. I was denied my CUE at the VARO level. I think it is very hard to win a CUE at the VARO level. They will just deny and tell you to appeal. They don't want to admit to a very costly mistake Now I have seven agent orange related conditions. This is worrisome and I wonder now many other RVN vets have AO conditions they don't know about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest jangrin

Good Job John,

The DMII secondary conditions are more dangerous and have more potential to do harm than does DMII itself. Arteriosclerosis, HBP/HTN, PN, Cataracts/blindness, are all very serious and are all a bi-product of DMII.

Vets need to get the secondary conditions SC'd to protect their spouce in the event of premature death, that can be directly connected to these conditions. Especially heart attacks and strokes.

I wonder how many veterans have recieved their 10 or 20 percent rating and are not even aware that they can be compensated for the other conditions that Diabetes causes.

I know you were already 100% T&P, does this make you 100% schedular? How long did it take for this claim to be approved?

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was awarded 10% Dec. 1, 2001 for DMII presumptive to AO. It was increased to 20% Nov. 9, 2004 due to addition of medication to control DMII. Also a CUE was made and an earlier effective date of May 8, 2001 since claim was made within 1 yr of date of law. I am just now starting to understand the additional secondary conditions related to DMII. I am currently waiting for a decision for C & P for PN involving both feet and early nephropathy involving fingers of both hands.

Since my BP is held at a lower standard than a healthy person, I belive that I should file for HBP since the VA has me on meds to control HBP. I will do this after a decision on the above C & P. Am I thinking right on this?

I also have periodontal disease and since DMII is a factor in this, should I file a claim on this also? The disease was diagnosed after my DMII.

The more I read, the more problems I see could afflict me.

Thanks for the help I have recieved here.

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jangrin

It only took about 7 months to get approved for the secondary claims. I am still IU and I don't think I will ever get to 100% schedular unless I go in the back door by filing for Housebound and if that was approved I think they might jump me up to the schedular. I have seen it done before that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin
Jangrin

It only took about 7 months to get approved for the secondary claims. I am still IU and I don't think I will ever get to 100% schedular unless I go in the back door by filing for Housebound and if that was approved I think they might jump me up to the schedular. I have seen it done before that way.

John,To be honest,

I hope both you and my husband and all other AO DMII vets are never SC'd 100% schedular from DMII, because at that point, physically and even mentally from the effects of arteriosclerosis, the quality of life will be rather poor. I hope if any of the vets have housebound from this disease it is when your 120 years old and would rather stay in than go outside anyway.

JMO, Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ed-I would add these claims if I were you-

If the VA says the HBP is Not related to the DMII and your atherosclerosis-(highly likely medically)they would sure have to come up with a pretty bizarre rationale to deny those claims.

They might try to say the HBP and gum disease preceded the DMII-and deny- yeah right- they would have to prove that with medical evidence.

The dental problem too- VA knows all about DMII and dental problems due to glucose as well as HBP and atherosclerosis- it is all in the VA DMII Training letter that I posted here at hadit in the past.

If you have ED-due to the DMII-you dont have to tell us- but good time to add that too.It is the SMC "K" award- about 84 bucks I think extra monthly comp-

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Believe it or not the gum disease is a risk factor for heart disease. The VA knows all about this so they cannot deny these facts. If your DMII causes the gum disease that is a double whammy for heart disease. My VA dental person lectures me on connection between gum disease and heart diseasae. File on everything and take care of those teeth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 2 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use