Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

TBI claim for SMC-T

Rate this question


scarf

Question

I am 100% P&T for PTSD and I just currently filled a new claim for residuals of TBI for SMC-T. I worked under 100% P&T; however, I stopped working due to dealing with the residuals of my TBI. VA just updated my claim for me to complete a TDIU form. Will this jeopardize my P&T status already for PTSD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I can't think of any circumstance where I would withdraw a claim rather than stand and fight for it. But, if withdrawal is someone else's strategy, I won't condem it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If the VA will not process the claim I apply for tbi and smc t.

Unless I did a claim for tdiu when I am alright 100%.

I am not doing a claim for something I didn't apply for. Some ppl may go along.

I am not one of them.

Now if the VA will not process the claim I Started TBI and smc t.

After I write a statement saying I am not applying for tdiu.

An if they still will not process it unless I apply for tdiu . yes I am withdraw it 

An would start over. 

What did you lose 2 3 months.

This is call been proactive. Sorry I am not a VA cheerleader.

So please stop with all the withdrawing claim stuff.

I stated when I post it here come the attack dogs. Smh lol

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Pretty sure the original poster has left the forum shaking his head.  Can we stay on topic?

If I was original poster, there is no reason to file for TDIU.  If the VA determines he's TDIU, it is what it is.  Sounds like they can't work anyhow.  I'd prefer the opportunity to work in limited environment/capacities (which I do) and not have TDIU.  TDIU may take this away from you.

First off, he needs to be approved for TBI.  He is not.  All this talk about TBI-T is for naught.  The VA is supposed to assume TBI-T if his situation is bad enough.  We all know this would have to be a case of 24 hour nursing home care and bedridden (worse case scenario).  So get the TBI approved, then go after TBI-T.  As it stands now, communicating in a logical way on a forum probably disqualifies the VA assuming TBI-T.  As it should.  But that is a fight fought later down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Chris Attig explains why you should continue perusing claims even when you've reached 100 percent.  Chris Attig is a Veterans law attorney, and has won me additional benefits, AND all my attorney fees were paid by EAJA.  

https://www.hadit.com/6-reasons-to-keep-pursuing-va-claims-and-appeals-after-you-reach-100-2/#gsc.tab=0

SMC, earlier effective dates, and survivor benefits are 3 of those 6 reasons.  You are right I may have confused people, you should read what Chris Attig has to say.  Remember, he is writing to help Veterans..he makes 0 money if you are 100 percent and apply for more benefits.  

If people claim to know more than the attorney's, they should just get their law degree and practice Veterans law.  

Otherwise, maybe at least considering the attorney's advice is prudent.  

I have never known "one single Veteran" who won any additional benefits by withdrawing a claim, or refusing an exam.  EXCEPTION:  There are times when VA "horsetrades" with Vets...you know, if you withdraw xy claim, we will grant ab claim, kind of a thing.  Of course, if you already withdrew your claim, on your own,  then you have nothing to horsetrade with.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 hours ago, broncovet said:

  Remember, he is writing to help Veterans..he makes 0 money if you are 100 percent and apply for more benefits.  

 

Usually, anytime you win additional benefits the lawyer makes money. If you are 100% and win housebound S there is an increase with retro pay that the attorney collects his percentage. I have been 100% for more than 18 years but I just had to do a $36,000.00 wire transfer to my legal team at CCK because I won additional benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
1 hour ago, jamescripps2 said:

I have been 100% for more than 18 years but I just had to do a $36,000.00 wire transfer to my legal team at CCK because I won additional benefits.

I am in a similar situation, but my appeal was at the CAVC, and they did a joint remand which is free and no cost to me the veteran. All lawyers get paid through the EAJA (EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT) when appeals go to the CAVC, but the veteran has to pay if the case is won at the BVA. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use