Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

DBQ added 8 months later?

Rate this question


allansc2005

Question

Morning folks,

 

Eight months ago I had a C&P exam for SC Miniere's disease, and am following it's progress on va.gov.

 

This morning I noticed they added a new DBQ dated July 13th, 2024.

 

I guess under any other circumstances a new DBQ would be good news, but 8 months AFTER my C&P exam?

 

Questions:

Does this late DBQ sound legit?

Does anyone know how to interpret all these numbers, letters..., associated with a DBQ; is there a "cheat sheet"?

I already know there are certain forms for each DBQ, Mental, Organs, Spine.., but here is my new DBQ(first million numbers and letters omitted )   4_1_DBQ_1015_1

 

Also please note that the VA won't give you a copy of a DBQ if the case hasn't been settled.

 

Thanks,

2-2-0 HOOAH!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Lemuel,

The meds for Meniere's don't seem to be working, which according to my ENT doctor isn't surprising as the disease has no known cure, and it's cause is not well understood.

Also, as I already have a 30% SC rating under 6204, as well as 10% SC for tinnitus, and now a diagnosed 6205, and from reading the Note associated with 6205, it looks like SC is established.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
36 minutes ago, allansc2005 said:

Lemuel,

The meds for Meniere's don't seem to be working, which according to my ENT doctor isn't surprising as the disease has no known cure, and it's cause is not well understood.

Also, as I already have a 30% SC rating under 6204, as well as 10% SC for tinnitus, and now a diagnosed 6205, and from reading the Note associated with 6205, it looks like SC is established.

 

 

Varying degrees of effectiveness.  And the drug my wife took was developed in Japan.  May not have passed U S FDC yet.  Or no big pharma wants to share the market.  

Wish you had better luck.  But you may be 100% with it.  Probably get SMC-s also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Only has to be "impaired gate", (dizziness that makes you walk like you are walking on ice with leather soled shoes) to be 100%.  Many Menier's syndrome victims spend at least one day a week in bed because they cannot stand up.  Surprised the VA went with the impaired gate for 100%.

Will have to check with my neurologist.  and get a new TBI rating.  I have that impaired gate about once-a-week average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You hit the nail on the head!

We who have Meniere's often experience "cycles" of vertigo which can last a week or more, and bed is the only safe haven from possible tragedy.

 

Luckily the C&P examiner I did visit was well "schooled" in the area of ear diseases, BOTH middle and inner ear, and after viewing my records and asking a few questions(like tinnitus, Meniere's has some subjective conditions the veteran needs to be asked about), she didn't take long before sending me on my way.

Why the VA asked for a IMO 8 months after the above C&P exam puzzles me, this came out of nowhere as I wasn't even contacted about it until the IMO was submitted on July 13th.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The why is the VA does not like to give a single rating of 100% to someone who can walk and talk when they are not in bed.  May be evaluating for SMC.  If a TBI is involved, it may be SMC-t paid at SMC-r2.  And that is waiting a VA Court of Appeals (CAVC) decision on the Secretary's extensive re-write of the code.

I check the case regularly for the decision and will post it when it comes up.  Because the CAVC decision will likely be appealed to the Court of Federal Appeals (CAFC) the CAVC panel wants to have all of their ducks in a row.  The decision was delayed on that account and waiting for a decision of SCOTUS on a similar issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
18 minutes ago, Lemuel said:

The why is the VA does not like to give a single rating of 100% to someone who can walk and talk when they are not in bed.  May be evaluating for SMC.  If a TBI is involved, it may be SMC-t paid at SMC-r2.  And that is waiting a VA Court of Appeals (CAVC) decision on the Secretary's extensive re-write of the code.

I check the case regularly for the decision and will post it when it comes up.  Because the CAVC decision will likely be appealed to the Court of Federal Appeals (CAFC) the CAVC panel wants to have all of their ducks in a row.  The decision was delayed on that account and waiting for a decision of SCOTUS on a similar issue.

The MH codes are being reevaluated to relax that, also, it’s a matter of how much and when. Federal Register has the write up of it. That’s likely complicating or lengthening the issue, also. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use