Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

DSM-IV and DSM-5 in Terms of PTSD and Its Effects on VA Disability Ratings


Recommended Posts

  • Founder

dsm5-001.pngEffective August 4, 2014, the amendment to 38 CFR 4.125 states that a mental disorder diagnosis must conform to the standards set in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Before that date, the regulation required diagnoses to conform to the DSM-IV.

Introduction

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has undergone significant changes in its diagnostic criteria with the transition from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) to the Fifth Edition (DSM-5). These changes have profound implications for veterans seeking disability ratings from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This article explores the critical differences between DSM-IV and DSM-5 in diagnosing PTSD, the rationale behind these changes, and their impact on VA disability ratings.

Evolution of PTSD Diagnostic Criteria

DSM-IV Criteria

Under DSM-IV, the classification of PTSD was under Anxiety Disorders, and the following criteria were required for diagnosis.

- Criterion A: Exposure to a traumatic event involving actual or threatened death, serious injury, or a threat to physical integrity, with a response involving intense fear, helplessness, or horror.

- Criterion B: Persistent re-experiencing of the traumatic event (e.g., flashbacks, nightmares).

- Criterion C: Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the Trauma and numbing of general responsiveness.

- Criterion D: Persistent symptoms of increased arousal (e.g., hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response).

- Criterion E: The duration of symptoms is more than one month.

- Criterion F: Significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

DSM-5 Criteria

The DSM-5 introduced several fundamental changes:

Reclassification moved PTSD from Anxiety Disorders to a new category called Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders 2 5.

- Criterion A: Expanded to include direct exposure, witnessing, learning about Trauma to a close relative or friend, and repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the traumatic event (e.g., first responders) 5.

- Criterion B: Re-experiencing symptoms remained similar but with refined descriptions.

- Criterion C: Avoidance symptoms were separated from numbing symptoms, now categorized under Criterion D.

- Criterion D: New category for negative alterations in cognitions and mood, including symptoms like persistent negative beliefs and feelings of detachment 1 7.

- Criterion E: Alterations in arousal and reactivity, including irritability, reckless behavior, and sleep disturbances.

- Criterion F: The duration of symptoms is more than one month.

- Criterion G: Significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

- Criterion H: Symptoms not attributable to substance use or other medical conditions.

Rationale for Changes

The changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 were driven by extensive research and clinical input aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy and reflecting a better understanding of PTSD. The reclassification into Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders acknowledges PTSD arises specifically from exposure to traumatic events, differentiating it from other anxiety disorders 1 5.

Impact on VA Disability Ratings

Diagnostic Criteria

The VA adopted DSM-5 criteria in August 2014, so they evaluate all PTSD disability claims received or pending review on or after this date using the new criteria 2.

This transition has several implications:

- Symptom Clusters: The separation of avoidance and numbing symptoms into distinct clusters (Criteria C and D) allows for more precise identification and documentation of PTSD symptoms 7.

- Expanded Criterion A: The broadened definition of traumatic exposure under Criterion A may lead to more veterans qualifying for a PTSD diagnosis, as it includes indirect exposure to trauma 9.

- Negative Cognitions and Mood: The inclusion of negative alterations in cognitions and mood (Criterion D) provides a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological impact of Trauma, potentially leading to higher disability ratings for veterans with severe symptoms. 1 5.

Evaluation and Rating

The VA rates PTSD on a scale from 0% to 100% based on the severity of symptoms and their impact on daily life, work efficiency, and social functioning 3.

The DSM-5 criteria influence this rating process in several ways:

- Detailed Symptom Documentation: The refined criteria require more detailed documentation of symptoms, which can aid in accurately assessing the severity of PTSD and determining the appropriate disability rating 6.

- Consistency in Evaluation: The standardized criteria help ensure consistency in evaluations across different VA examiners and facilities, potentially reducing variability in disability ratings 6.

- Potential for Higher Ratings: The new symptom clusters and expanded definitions may lead to higher ratings for veterans with complex PTSD presentations, as the criteria capture a broader range of symptoms and their effects 5.

Challenges and Considerations

While the DSM-5 criteria offer several advantages, there are also challenges and considerations for veterans and clinicians:

- Transition Period: The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 may have led to initial evaluation inconsistencies as clinicians adapted to the new criteria 5.

- Documentation Requirements: The detailed documentation required by DSM-5 can be time-consuming for clinicians and may require additional training and resources 6.

- Impact on Prevalence: Some studies suggest that the prevalence of PTSD diagnoses may decrease slightly under DSM-5 because of the more stringent criteria, mainly the exclusion of sudden unexpected death of a loved one from Criterion A 9.

Conclusion

The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 brought significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, reflecting advancements in our understanding of the disorder. These changes have important implications for veterans seeking VA disability ratings. The reclassification of PTSD expanded definitions of traumatic exposure and refined symptom clusters provide a more comprehensive framework for diagnosing and evaluating PTSD. While the new criteria offer several benefits, including more detailed documentation and consistency in evaluations, they also present challenges regarding adaptation and documentation requirements. Overall, the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD are a step forward in accurately diagnosing and assessing the impact of Trauma on veterans. By understanding these changes and their implications, veterans and clinicians can better navigate the VA disability rating process and ensure that veterans receive the support and compensation they deserve.

Related Articles

Sources:

-      (1) Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5: Controversy, Change ...

-      (2) Understanding Your PTSD Rating (Update 2023)

-      (3) Guide To PTSD VA Rating | Veteran Disability Benefit Lawyer

-      (4) [PDF] Finalizing PTSD in DSM-5: Getting Here From There and Where to ...

-      (5) Big Changes Coming: DSM-5 Criteria for PTSD - Veterans Help Group - (6) [PDF] Impact of Evidence-Based Standardized Assessment on the ...

-      (7) DSM-5 Criteria for PTSD - Brainline.org

-      (8) [PDF] Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5

-      (9) PTSD and DSM-5 - PTSD: National Center for PTSD - VA.gov

-      (10) [PDF] Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms ...


View full record

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use